cam a22 7 4500 551362936 CHVBK 20201114033537.0 m d cr |n |||||||| 150415t20152015nyu sb 001 0 eng d 2015938776 978-0-19-874678-2 (hardback) 0-19-874678-4 (hardback) (SERSOL)ssj0001587536 (WaSeSS)ssj0001587536 ERASA eng ERASA BDX BTCTA CDX YDXCP YNK NLE OCLCO OCLCF CLU AUM GZN OLC EYR TKN UBY DLC WaSeSS rda N70 .K48 2015 700 Kivy Peter author De gustibus arguing about taste and why we do it Peter Kivy First edition. New York, New York Oxford University Press 2015 ©2015 1 online resource (xii, 173 pages) text txt rdacontent/eng computer c rdamedia/eng online resource cr rdacarrier/eng Includes bibliographical references and index. Hume's Dilemma -- A Ground Common to All -- The Beautiful Versus the Good (in the Eighteenth Century) -- Simple Emotivism -- Do So as Well -- The Aesthetic Shrug -- Immoral Art -- Is Bad Taste Immoral? -- Push-Pin and Poetry -- Back to Square One -- The Right Phenomenology? -- The Truth of Interpretation -- The Truth of Analysis -- The Truth of Evaluation -- Common Sense and the Error Theory. Lizenzbedingungen können den Zugang einschränken. License restrictions may limit access. In 'De Gustibus' Peter Kivy deals with a question that has never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do we argue about art? We argue about the 'facts' of the world either to influence people's behaviour or simply to get them to see what we take to be the truth about the world. We argue over ethical matters, if we are ethical 'realists,' because we think we are arguing about 'facts' in the world. And we argue about ethics, if we are 'emotivists,' or are now what are called 'expressionists,' which is to say, people who think matters of ethics are simply matters of 'attitude,' to influence the behaviour of others. But why should we argue about works of art? There are no 'actions' we wish to motivate. Whether I think Bach is greater than Beethoven and you think the opposite, why should it matter to either of us to convince the other? This is a question that philosophers have never faced. Kivy claims here that we argue over taste because we think, mistakenly or not, that we are arguing over matters of fact. Art Philosophy Aesthetics Arts Philosophy and aesthetics http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746782.001.0001/acprof-9780198746782 Uni Basel: Volltext https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746782.001.0001/acprof-9780198746782 Uni Bern: Volltext BK020053 XK020053 XK020000 Oxford Scholarship Online Philosophy Collection 2015-2016 E-Books von 360MarcUpdates Oxford Scholarship Online IDSBB A145 A145 145VT IDSBB B405 B405 405VT NELB4052004 IDSBB 100 1- Kivy Peter author IDSBB 856 40 http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746782.001.0001/acprof-9780198746782 Uni Basel: Volltext IDSBB 856 40 https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746782.001.0001/acprof-9780198746782 Uni Bern: Volltext SWISSBIB 358026415