cad a22 4500 551414421 20190318052517.0 cr unu---uuuuu 181214e20190401xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s00330-018-5736-0 doi (ZORA)oai:www.zora.uzh.ch:159302 610 ddc 30276672 pmid How accurate and precise are CT based measurements of iodine concentration? A comparison of the minimum detectable concentration difference among single source and dual source dual energy CT in a phantom study [Elektronische Daten] [André Euler, Justin Solomon, Maciej A Mazurowski, Ehsan Samei, Rendon C Nelson] closedAccess eu-repo OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of scan- and patient-related factors on the error and the minimum detectable difference in iodine concentration among different generations of single-source (SS) fast kV-switching and dual-source (DS) dual-energy CT (DECT). METHODS Lesions having eight different iodine concentrations (0.2-4 mgI/mL) were emulated in a 3D-printed phantom of medium and large size. Each combination of concentration and size was scanned in dual-energy mode on four different SS and DS DECTs. Radiation doses were 7 and 10 mGy (medium size) and 10, 13, and 16 mGy (large size). Iodine maps were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and vendor-specific iterative reconstruction algorithms (IRs). Absolute error of iodine quantification (E) was measured. Multivariate regression models determined the influence of CT scanner, iodine concentration, phantom size, radiation dose, and reconstruction algorithm on E. The minimum detectable difference in iodine concentration (IC) under the same imaging conditions (intra-conditional) and among different imaging conditions (inter-conditional) was calculated. RESULTS The error was significantly lower in current than in previous DECT generations (p < 0.001). For all CT scanner conditions, the error was significantly higher with increasing phantom size and decreasing radiation dose (p < 0.001). Iodine concentration only significantly affected the error for SS DECT (p < 0.001). IC depended on patient- and scan-related factors and ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 mgI/mL. CONCLUSIONS Patient- and scan-related factors have a significant impact on the error and minimum detectable difference in iodine concentration within and among SS fast kV-switching and DS DECT. KEY POINTS • Patient- and scan-related factors have a significant impact on the error and minimum detectable difference in dual-energy CT-based iodine quantification. • Third-generation DECTs outperformed second-generation scanners for both single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT. • The minimum intra- and inter-conditional detectable difference in iodine concentration ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 mg iodine/mL. Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology zora Euler André joint author Solomon Justin joint author Mazurowski Maciej A. joint author Samei Ehsan joint author Nelson Rendon C. joint author European Radiology 29(4):2069-2078 https://www.zora.uzh.ch/159302 text/html WWW-Backlink auf das Repository 1 Journal Article PeerReviewed zora ZORA 856 40 https://www.zora.uzh.ch/159302 text/html WWW-Backlink auf das Repository ZORA 700 1- Euler André joint author ZORA 700 1- Solomon Justin joint author ZORA 700 1- Mazurowski Maciej A. joint author ZORA 700 1- Samei Ehsan joint author ZORA 700 1- Nelson Rendon C. joint author ZORA 773 0- European Radiology 29(4):2069-2078 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 ZORA ZORA ZORA Journal Article closedAccess