cad a22 4500 551468122 20200417040219.0 cr unu---uuuuu 181215e201804 xx s 000 0 eng 10.5167/uzh-159402 doi 10.1111/joor.12612 doi (ZORA)oai:www.zora.uzh.ch:159402 610 ddc 29385632 pmid Immediate and delayed loading of fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs [Elektronische Daten] [G Cesaretti, N P Lang, P Viganò, F Bengazi, K A Apaza Alccayhuaman, D Botticelli] openAccess eu-repo To evaluate presumptive differences in osseointegration at implants supporting crowns that are physiologically loaded either immediately or 3months after installation. All premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six dogs. After 3months of healing, three implants were installed on the premolar region and two in the molar region in one side of the mandible. Likewise, after another 3months, five implants were installed in the contralateral side, and impressions were taken bilaterally. Within 48hours, two single crowns were screwed bilaterally onto two implants in the premolar region, and two splinted crowns reproducing the shape of the first molar were screwed bilaterally onto the implants in the molar region. The mesial implants were used as no-loaded controls. Sacrifices were performed after 3months, and histological analyses were performed. At the premolar sites, mineralised bone-to-implant contact (MBIC%) was 78.0±4.0% and 70.9±7.9% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively. This difference was statistically significant. At the control implants, MBIC% was 61.4±14.7% and 63.1±13.1% at the delayed and the immediately loaded sites, respectively. At the molar sites, MBIC% was 79.2±10.9% and 61.1±10.3% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively. Applying a delayed loading to fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants yielded higher proportions of bone-to-implant contact (osseointegration) compared to immediately loaded implants. Moreover, both types of loading protocols yielded a higher rate of osseointegration compared to unloaded implant sites after 3months following implant installation. Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry zora Cesaretti G. joint author Lang N P. joint author Viganò P. joint author Bengazi F. joint author Apaza Alccayhuaman K A. joint author Botticelli D. joint author Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 45(4):308-316 https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/159402/1/Cesaretti_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Oral_Rehabilitation_acc.pdf text/html WWW-Backlink auf das Repository 1 Journal Article PeerReviewed zora ZORA 856 40 https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/159402/1/Cesaretti_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Oral_Rehabilitation_acc.pdf text/html WWW-Backlink auf das Repository ZORA 700 1- Cesaretti G. joint author ZORA 700 1- Lang N P. joint author ZORA 700 1- Viganò P. joint author ZORA 700 1- Bengazi F. joint author ZORA 700 1- Apaza Alccayhuaman K A. joint author ZORA 700 1- Botticelli D. joint author ZORA 773 0- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 45(4):308-316 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 ZORA ZORA ZORA Journal Article openAccess