<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">555285243</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20201130031324.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">190206e20190109xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(BORIS)oai:boris.unibe.ch:123653</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">610</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Karen Triep, Thomas A. Beck, Jacques Donzé, Olga Endrich]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">publishedVersion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">openAccess</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">eu-repo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BACKGROUND  With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timing is relevant with regard to the case's severity, resource consumption and quality of care. In this study we analyzed the diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission (POA) indicator using routinely collected health data.  METHODS  We included all inpatient cases of the department of medicine during 2016 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus ulcer or delirium. Swiss coding guidelines of 2016 and the definitions of the Swiss medical statistics of hospitals were analyzed to evaluate the potential to encode information on diagnosis timing. The diagnoses were revised by applying the information present-on-admission by a coding specialist and by a medical expert, serving as Gold Standard. The diagnostic value and reliability were evaluated.  RESULTS  The inter-rater reliability for POA of all diagnoses was 0.7133 (Cohen's kappa), but differed between diagnosis groups (0.558-0.7164). The rate of POA positive of the total applied by the coding specialist versus the expert was similar, but differed between diagnoses. In group &quot;thrombosis&quot; SEN was 0.95, SPE 0.75, PPV 0.97 and NPV 0.60, in group &quot;decubitus ulcer&quot; SEN 0.89, SPE 0.82, PPV 0.89 and NPV 0.82, in group &quot;delirium&quot; SEN 0.91, SPE 0.65, PPV 0.71 and NPV 0.88 For all diagnoses SEN 0.92, SPE 0.73, PPV 0.87, NPV 0.82, summing up the cases of all diagnosis groups.  CONCLUSIONS  Coding the POA indicator identified diagnoses which were pre-existent with insufficient reliability on individual patient's level. The overall fair to sufficient diagnostic quality is appropriate for screening and benchmarking performance on population level. As the medical statistics of hospitals carries no variable on pre-existing conditions, the novel approach to apply the POA indicator to diagnoses gives more information on quality of hospital care and complexity of cases. By preparing documentation for POA reporting diagnostic quality must be increased before implementation for risk-assessment or reimbursement on the individual patient's level.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Triep</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Karen</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Beck</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Thomas A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Donzé</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jacques</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Endrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Olga</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">BMC health services research</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19(1), p. 23</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via WWW</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Triep, Karen; Beck, Thomas A.; Donzé, Jacques; Endrich, Olga (2019). Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center. BMC health services research, 19(1), p. 23. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3 &lt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3&gt;</subfield>
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">boris</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">PeerReviewed</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">boris peerstatus</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="j">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">openAccess</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via WWW</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Triep, Karen; Beck, Thomas A.; Donzé, Jacques; Endrich, Olga (2019). Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center. BMC health services research, 19(1), p. 23. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3 &lt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Triep</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Karen</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Beck</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Thomas A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Donzé</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jacques</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Endrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Olga</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">BORIS</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">BMC health services research</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19(1), p. 23</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
