cam a22 4 4500 555320383 CHVBK 20190323032541.0 180626s2019 xxu b||| 001 0 eng|c 2018018662 978-1-138-08741-5 hardcover 1-138-08741-6 hardcover 978-1-138-08742-2 paperback 1-138-08742-4 paperback 978-1-315-11049-3 electronic book (OCoLC)1047534819 (IDSBB)007061747 (OCoLC)1047534819 LBSOR/DLC ger DLC OCLCO OCLCF YDX L2U OCLCO SzZuIDS BS/BE B400 rda JA85 .A35 2019 320.01/4 23 320 15 Aikin Scott F. 1971- (DE-588)1052900399 Verfasser aut Why we argue (and how we should) a guide to political disagreement in an age of unreason Scott F. Aikin and Robert B. Talisse Second edition New York, NY London Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019 xxvi, 218 Seiten Text txt rdacontent/ger ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia/ger Band nc rdacarrier/ger "First edition published 2014 by Routledge" Includes bibliographical references and index "Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in the Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one's individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one's society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy. Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate. What's New in the Second Edition: - Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency - Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media) - Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter - The addition of five new chapters: o Deep Disagreement o Argument by Analogy o Argument between the Ads o The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage) o Argumentative Responsibility and Repair"-- Communication in politics Debates and debating Communication in politics fast Debates and debating fast 89.06 political philosophy nbc Politische Auseinandersetzung (DE-588)4215794-8 gnd Politischer Konflikt (DE-588)4115589-0 gnd Politische Kommunikation (DE-588)4134262-8 gnd Talisse Robert B. 1970- (DE-588)139783180 Verfasser aut Stoppsignal FRED nebis DS IDSBB 100 1- Aikin Scott F. 1971- (DE-588)1052900399 Verfasser aut IDSBB 700 1- Talisse Robert B. 1970- (DE-588)139783180 Verfasser aut SWISSBIB 311527108 BK020000 XK020000 XK020000 IDSBB B400 B400 400H5 BeM RFA 94334 NELB4001903 IDSBB DSV51 DSV01 B400 http://www.ub.unibas.ch/tox/IDSBB/007061747/PDF pdf VIEW Inhaltsverzeichnis