Moving parts: the natural alliance between dynamical and mechanistic modeling approaches
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605448205 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100135.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20151101xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10539-015-9499-6 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10539-015-9499-6 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kaplan |D David |u Department of Cognitive Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CCD), Perception in Action Research Centre (PARC), Macquarie University, Australian Hearing Hub 3.822, 16 University Drive, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Moving parts: the natural alliance between dynamical and mechanistic modeling approaches |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [David Kaplan] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Recently, it has been provocatively claimed that dynamical modeling approaches signal the emergence of a new explanatory framework distinct from that of mechanistic explanation. This paper rejects this proposal and argues that dynamical explanations are fully compatible with, even naturally construed as, instances of mechanistic explanations. Specifically, it is argued that the mathematical framework of dynamics provides a powerful descriptive scheme for revealing temporal features of activities in mechanisms and plays an explanatory role to the extent it is deployed for this purpose. It is also suggested that more attention should be paid to the distinctive methodological contributions of the dynamical framework including its usefulness as a heuristic for mechanism discovery and hypothesis generation in contemporary neuroscience and biology. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Mechanism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Dynamics |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Explanation |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Models |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Neuroscience |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Biology & Philosophy |d Springer Netherlands |g 30/6(2015-11-01), 757-786 |x 0169-3867 |q 30:6<757 |1 2015 |2 30 |o 10539 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9499-6 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9499-6 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Kaplan |D David |u Department of Cognitive Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CCD), Perception in Action Research Centre (PARC), Macquarie University, Australian Hearing Hub 3.822, 16 University Drive, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Biology & Philosophy |d Springer Netherlands |g 30/6(2015-11-01), 757-786 |x 0169-3867 |q 30:6<757 |1 2015 |2 30 |o 10539 | ||