Understanding complexity: Are we making progress?

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Geoffrey Chambers]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Biology & Philosophy, 30/5(2015-09-01), 747-756
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605448450
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605448450
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100136.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150901xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10539-014-9468-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10539-014-9468-5 
100 1 |a Chambers  |D Geoffrey  |u School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Understanding complexity: Are we making progress?  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Geoffrey Chambers] 
520 3 |a In recent years a new conceptual tool called Complexity Theory has come to the attention of scientists and philosophers. This approach is concerned with the emergent properties of interacting systems. It has found wide applicability from cosmology to Social Structure Analysis. However, practitioners are still struggling to find the best way to define complexity and then to measure it. A new book Complexity and the arrow of time by Lineweaver et al. (2013) contains contributions from scholars who provide critical reviews of Complexity Theory and its wider applications. This is a huge task and this essay examines how well the authors have succeeded in satisfying the claim made by the book's three editors to have clarified the leading questions. I also explore the application of Complexity Theory to Biology as a means to explain the popular view that biological complexity (as viewed in many guises and at many levels) has increased over time. In this regard, I conclude by recommending an Information Theory approach which urges that physical complexity arises from accumulation of genetic coding sequences. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Complexity Theory  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cosmology  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Evolution  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Genomic structure  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Biology & Philosophy  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 30/5(2015-09-01), 747-756  |x 0169-3867  |q 30:5<747  |1 2015  |2 30  |o 10539 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9468-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a review-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9468-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Chambers  |D Geoffrey  |u School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Biology & Philosophy  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 30/5(2015-09-01), 747-756  |x 0169-3867  |q 30:5<747  |1 2015  |2 30  |o 10539