The mature limited access order at the doorstep: Imperial Germany and contemporary China in transition

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Erik Grimmer-Solem]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Constitutional Political Economy, 26/1(2015-03-01), 103-120
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605454949
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605454949
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100209.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150301xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10602-014-9169-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10602-014-9169-8 
100 1 |a Grimmer-Solem  |D Erik  |u Department of History, Wesleyan University, 238 Church Street, 06459, Middletown, CT, USA  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The mature limited access order at the doorstep: Imperial Germany and contemporary China in transition  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Erik Grimmer-Solem] 
520 3 |a A basic premise of the limited/open access orders framework of North, Wallis, Webb and Weingast is a variant of the Hayek-Friedman hypothesis that economic and political freedom sustain each other. Keys to this framework are the specific "doorstep” conditions that enable a transition from limited to open access, which the authors draw from the historical experience of Britain, France and the United States. This essay analyzes the transition process of Imperial Germany to reveal that maintaining economic competition did not depend on democracy and that the middle classes became stakeholders in authoritarianism. It then explores the specific challenges posed by this large, mature limited access order as it was integrated into an international system sustained by a declining liberal hegemon, Great Britain. The refinements of the framework suggested by the case of Imperial Germany allow for a better understanding of some of the parallel transition processes in present-day China and its evolving relationship to both the United States and the current international order. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Development  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Transition  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Limited/open access order  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Hayek-Friedman hypothesis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a International order  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Germany  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a China  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/1(2015-03-01), 103-120  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:1<103  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9169-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9169-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Grimmer-Solem  |D Erik  |u Department of History, Wesleyan University, 238 Church Street, 06459, Middletown, CT, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/1(2015-03-01), 103-120  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:1<103  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602