Analytic conservatism and analytic radicalism: Of understated distinctions and other analytical things

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Michael Brooks]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Constitutional Political Economy, 26/4(2015-12-01), 442-454
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605455023
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605455023
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100210.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5 
100 1 |a Brooks  |D Michael  |u Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 84, 7001, Hobart, TAS, Australia  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Analytic conservatism and analytic radicalism: Of understated distinctions and other analytical things  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Michael Brooks] 
520 3 |a I re-examine Brennan and Hamlin's so-called convexity argument for analytic conservatism and Taylor's counter-argument that a sufficiently strong exit option may provide a case for analytic radicalism. In doing so, I expose and underscore some of the implicit assumptions and understated distinctions that are present in some of the extant literature on analytic conservatism. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Analytic conservatism  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Analytic radicalism  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Idealism  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Exit option  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Risk preference  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/4(2015-12-01), 442-454  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:4<442  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Brooks  |D Michael  |u Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 84, 7001, Hobart, TAS, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/4(2015-12-01), 442-454  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:4<442  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602