caa a22 4500 605455023 CHVBK 20210128100210.0 cr unu---uuuuu 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5 Brooks Michael Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 84, 7001, Hobart, TAS, Australia aut Analytic conservatism and analytic radicalism: Of understated distinctions and other analytical things [Elektronische Daten] [Michael Brooks] I re-examine Brennan and Hamlin's so-called convexity argument for analytic conservatism and Taylor's counter-argument that a sufficiently strong exit option may provide a case for analytic radicalism. In doing so, I expose and underscore some of the implicit assumptions and understated distinctions that are present in some of the extant literature on analytic conservatism. Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 Analytic conservatism nationallicence Analytic radicalism nationallicence Idealism nationallicence Exit option nationallicence Risk preference nationallicence Constitutional Political Economy Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 26/4(2015-12-01), 442-454 1043-4062 26:4<442 2015 26 10602 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9191-5 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Brooks Michael Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 84, 7001, Hobart, TAS, Australia aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Constitutional Political Economy Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com 26/4(2015-12-01), 442-454 1043-4062 26:4<442 2015 26 10602