Modeling the individual for constitutional choice

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Brian Kogelmann]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Constitutional Political Economy, 26/4(2015-12-01), 455-474
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60545504X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60545504X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100210.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10602-015-9197-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10602-015-9197-z 
100 1 |a Kogelmann  |D Brian  |u University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Modeling the individual for constitutional choice  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Brian Kogelmann] 
520 3 |a This paper is about the use of the homo economicus behavioral model in the constitutional political economy research program. The paper argues that all existing arguments in defense of the behavioral model fail. These arguments are: the symmetry argument, the enterprise argument, the increasing costs argument, and the crowding out argument. As a result, those working in the constitutional political economy tradition are not justified in employing homo economicus, at least not until a new argument successfully defending the behavioral model is provided. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Constitutional political economy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Constitutional choice  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Homo economicus  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Behavioral modeling  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Rational choice  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a James M. Buchanan  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Geoffrey Brennan  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/4(2015-12-01), 455-474  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:4<455  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9197-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9197-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Kogelmann  |D Brian  |u University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Constitutional Political Economy  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 26/4(2015-12-01), 455-474  |x 1043-4062  |q 26:4<455  |1 2015  |2 26  |o 10602