Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Daniel M. Buckland, Patrick Sadoghi, Matthias Wimmer, Patrick Vavken, Geert Pagenstert, Victor Valderrabano, Claudio Rosso]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23/1(2015-01-01), 83-89
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605456119
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605456119
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100216.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00167-014-2966-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00167-014-2966-9 
245 0 0 |a Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Daniel M. Buckland, Patrick Sadoghi, Matthias Wimmer, Patrick Vavken, Geert Pagenstert, Victor Valderrabano, Claudio Rosso] 
520 3 |a Purpose: Meniscal repair devices have been extensively tested during the past decades as reported in the literature. Reviewing the different meniscal repair devices and sutures with their respective biomechanical properties. Methods: For this meta-analysis, we conducted a systematic online search using PubMed, EMBASE, CCTR, and CINAHL using the search terms Meniscus OR Meniscal AND Biomechanics AND Repair). Load-to-failure (LtF), stiffness, and cyclic outcome measures were extracted independently and in duplicate. The systematic search revealed 841 manuscripts in total. After exclusion of duplicates and irrelevant publications, 41 studies remained for final analysis. The studies were published in English and German from 1995 to 2013. Due to differing cyclic force protocols, cyclic outcomes had to be excluded. Results: Overall, sutures had a higher LtF [suture: 87.7±0.3N (weighted mean±standard error), device: 56.3±0.1N] and stiffness (suture: 8.9±0.04N/mm, device: 8.6±0.04N/mm) than devices, both p<0.05. In LfT testing, PDS 0 Vertical (145.0±8.1N), OrthoCord 2-0 (143.6±11.3N), and Ethibond No 0 Vertical (133.4±7.7N) were the strongest sutures and Meniscal Viper (140.9±5.1N), MaxFire Vertical (136.2±11.3N), and FasT-Fix Vertical (115.2±1.6N) were the strongest devices. Second-generation devices were significantly stronger and stiffer than first-generation devices (p<0.001). Clinical relevance: Suture repair remains the gold standard with a vertically oriented suture configuration showing superior LtF values compared to a horizontal configuration. Nevertheless, some meniscal repair devices have similar biomechanical properties to suture repairs. Both suture repairs and devices have a place in meniscal restoration. Level of evidence: None, meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a Meniscus  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Repair  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Biomechanics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Load-to-failure  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Stiffness  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Devices  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a M. Buckland  |D Daniel  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sadoghi  |D Patrick  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wimmer  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vavken  |D Patrick  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pagenstert  |D Geert  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Valderrabano  |D Victor  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rosso  |D Claudio  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/1(2015-01-01), 83-89  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:1<83  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2966-9  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a review-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2966-9  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a M. Buckland  |D Daniel  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Sadoghi  |D Patrick  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wimmer  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Vavken  |D Patrick  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Pagenstert  |D Geert  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Valderrabano  |D Victor  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Rosso  |D Claudio  |u Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/1(2015-01-01), 83-89  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:1<83  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167