A matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: peek-carbon composite plate versus titanium plate

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Matthias Cotic, Stephan Vogt, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Matthias Feucht, Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Tibor Schuster, Andreas Imhoff]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23/7(2015-07-01), 2032-2040
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60545728X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60545728X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100222.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150701xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00167-014-2914-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00167-014-2914-8 
245 0 2 |a A matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: peek-carbon composite plate versus titanium plate  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Matthias Cotic, Stephan Vogt, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Matthias Feucht, Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Tibor Schuster, Andreas Imhoff] 
520 3 |a Purpose: The first purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome of two different locking plates used for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The second purpose was to histologically evaluate peek-carbon wear for biocompatibility. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients undergoing open-wedge HTO using the first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® (Group I) were matched with 26 patients after open-wedge HTO with the TomoFix™ plate (Group II). Clinical scores (visual analogue scale for pain, WOMAC, Lysholm score) were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 24months postoperatively. Fixation stability was evaluated radiographically by comparing the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and tibial slope 2days after open-wedge HTO and after implant removal. Tissue samples of Group I were collected at the time of implant removal for histologic evaluation. Results: Implant-related complications occurred in 15% (n=4) of Group I and 0% of Group II. Out of them, 3 implant replacements were excluded from statistical analyses. After a final median follow-up of 25months (range 24-31), the clinical scores in both groups showed significant improvements compared to preoperatively (visual analogue scale, WOMAC, Lysholm score; p<0.001), without significant group differences (visual analogue scale, n.s.; WOMAC, n.s.; Lysholm score, n.s.). No significant differences between baseline and follow-up measurements for MPTA and tibial slope were observed within each group (MPTA: Gr. I, n.s.; Gr. II, n.s.; tibial slope: Gr. I, n.s.; Gr. II, n.s.) or between the two groups (MPTA, n.s.; tibial slope, n.s.). In histologic samples, CF PEEK abrasion did not induce inflammation or tissue necrosis. Conclusion: The first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® provided a higher rate of implant-related complications compared to the TomoFix™ plate at a minimum follow-up of 24months after valgus-producing open-wedge HTO. Therefore, it is not recommended to use the first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® in the clinical practice. Level of evidence: III. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a High tibial osteotomy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Open wedge  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a PEEKPower HTO-plate  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a TomoFix plate  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Cotic  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vogt  |D Stephan  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hinterwimmer  |D Stefan  |u Sportsclinic Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Feucht  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Slotta-Huspenina  |D Julia  |u Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schuster  |D Tibor  |u Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Occupational Health, McGill University Montreal, Montreal, Canada  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Imhoff  |D Andreas  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/7(2015-07-01), 2032-2040  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:7<2032  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2914-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2914-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Cotic  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Vogt  |D Stephan  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Hinterwimmer  |D Stefan  |u Sportsclinic Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Feucht  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Slotta-Huspenina  |D Julia  |u Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Schuster  |D Tibor  |u Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Occupational Health, McGill University Montreal, Montreal, Canada  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Imhoff  |D Andreas  |u Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/7(2015-07-01), 2032-2040  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:7<2032  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167