Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction is attractive but not yet cost efficient

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Jennifer Margier, Sandra Tchouda, Jean-Jacques Banihachemi, Jean-Luc Bosson, Stéphane Plaweski]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23/4(2015-04-01), 1026-1034
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605458693
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605458693
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100230.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2 
245 0 0 |a Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction is attractive but not yet cost efficient  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Jennifer Margier, Sandra Tchouda, Jean-Jacques Banihachemi, Jean-Luc Bosson, Stéphane Plaweski] 
520 3 |a Purpose: Conventional reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has a high success rate. Computer-assisted navigation systems (CANSs) have been developed to further improve the accuracy of tunnel positioning. What is the economic impact from the hospital perspective? Methods: Patients having a first ACL reconstruction procedure were included in a prospective multicentre open controlled study comparing two groups: CANS versus conventional surgery. The primary clinical efficacy criterion was the objective International Knee Documentation Committee score at 1-2-year follow-up. Costs were collected retrospectively nationwide. Results: No significant differences were found for the clinical effectiveness between conventional surgery (100 patients) and CANS (114 patients) at follow-up: ORadjusted 1.01 [0.36-2.84] (n.s). Junior surgeons achieved a significant mean decrease in operating time during the study period: 30% in the CANS group compared with 10% in the control group (p<0.01). The average cost of surgery was 704€ for the control group and 1,158€ for the CANS group (p<0.01). The cost of the operating room accounts for >70% of the total cost. The surgeon's status and the technical CANS learning effect influenced this cost. The cost differential between the two groups decreased with ‘CANS' expertise: 238€ and 271€ in ‘expert' centres versus 427€ to 731€ in other centres. Conclusion: While our study demonstrates the feasibility and the potential interest of CANS for training in ACL reconstruction, from a hospital perspective it is not cost efficient at present. Level of evidence: Economic and decision analysis—developing an economic or decision model, Level II. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a Orthopaedics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Health economics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Knee joint surgery  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Computer-assisted navigation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Robotics  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Margier  |D Jennifer  |u Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tchouda  |D Sandra  |u Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Banihachemi  |D Jean-Jacques  |u Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bosson  |D Jean-Luc  |u Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Plaweski  |D Stéphane  |u Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie du Sport, Urgences Hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/4(2015-04-01), 1026-1034  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:4<1026  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Margier  |D Jennifer  |u Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Tchouda  |D Sandra  |u Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Banihachemi  |D Jean-Jacques  |u Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bosson  |D Jean-Luc  |u Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Plaweski  |D Stéphane  |u Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie du Sport, Urgences Hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/4(2015-04-01), 1026-1034  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:4<1026  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167