<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605458693</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100230.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction is attractive but not yet cost efficient</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Jennifer Margier, Sandra Tchouda, Jean-Jacques Banihachemi, Jean-Luc Bosson, Stéphane Plaweski]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Purpose: Conventional reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has a high success rate. Computer-assisted navigation systems (CANSs) have been developed to further improve the accuracy of tunnel positioning. What is the economic impact from the hospital perspective? Methods: Patients having a first ACL reconstruction procedure were included in a prospective multicentre open controlled study comparing two groups: CANS versus conventional surgery. The primary clinical efficacy criterion was the objective International Knee Documentation Committee score at 1-2-year follow-up. Costs were collected retrospectively nationwide. Results: No significant differences were found for the clinical effectiveness between conventional surgery (100 patients) and CANS (114 patients) at follow-up: ORadjusted 1.01 [0.36-2.84] (n.s). Junior surgeons achieved a significant mean decrease in operating time during the study period: 30% in the CANS group compared with 10% in the control group (p&lt;0.01). The average cost of surgery was 704€ for the control group and 1,158€ for the CANS group (p&lt;0.01). The cost of the operating room accounts for &gt;70% of the total cost. The surgeon's status and the technical CANS learning effect influenced this cost. The cost differential between the two groups decreased with ‘CANS' expertise: 238€ and 271€ in ‘expert' centres versus 427€ to 731€ in other centres. Conclusion: While our study demonstrates the feasibility and the potential interest of CANS for training in ACL reconstruction, from a hospital perspective it is not cost efficient at present. Level of evidence: Economic and decision analysis—developing an economic or decision model, Level II.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Orthopaedics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Health economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Knee joint surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Computer-assisted navigation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Robotics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Margier</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jennifer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tchouda</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sandra</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Banihachemi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-Jacques</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bosson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-Luc</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Plaweski</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Stéphane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie du Sport, Urgences Hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/4(2015-04-01), 1026-1034</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-2056</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:4&lt;1026</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">167</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2831-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Margier</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jennifer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Tchouda</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sandra</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Cellule d'évaluation médico-économique des innovations, Pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Banihachemi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-Jacques</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bosson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-Luc</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG-CNRS, UMR CNRS Université Alpes-Grenoble UMR 5525, CHU Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Plaweski</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Stéphane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie du Sport, Urgences Hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/4(2015-04-01), 1026-1034</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-2056</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:4&lt;1026</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">167</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
