Assessment of essential characteristics of two different scaffolds for tendon in situ regeneration

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Markus Wagenhäuser, Matthias Pietschmann, Denitsa Docheva, Mehmet Gülecyüz, Volkmar Jansson, Peter Müller]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23/4(2015-04-01), 1239-1246
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605458979
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605458979
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100231.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00167-013-2820-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00167-013-2820-5 
245 0 0 |a Assessment of essential characteristics of two different scaffolds for tendon in situ regeneration  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Markus Wagenhäuser, Matthias Pietschmann, Denitsa Docheva, Mehmet Gülecyüz, Volkmar Jansson, Peter Müller] 
520 3 |a Purpose: Rotator cuff tears are challenging as the rate of re-ruptures remains high. Thus, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed. Tendon in situ regeneration (TSR) attempts to produce cell-scaffold constructs in vitro, which can produce tendinous tissue of high quality after replantation. Therefore, it is essential to find suitable scaffolds that can provide acceptable biofunctionality and biocompatibility. This study compares characteristics of scaffolds for in situ regeneration: a polyglycolic acid/PDS scaffold (PP-sca) (Ethisorb, Ethicon, Germany) and a collagen sponge (col-spo) (TissueTek, Germany) with a basal strengthening membrane. Methods: Tendon-derived cells (TDCs) were isolated from the long head of the biceps tendon. Gene expression for collagen type I, collagen type III, decorin, scleraxis and tenomodulin was analysed in the third cell passage. Cell proliferation in cell seeded scaffolds was tested using a WST-1 assay. In addition, the tensile strength of both scaffolds was measured using a universal-testing machine (Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany). Results: The results from this study indicate a genotypic drift during the in vitro cultivation of the TDCs. The PP-sca showed good biofunctional results, including low initial loss of cells after cell seeding. The proliferation rates were approximately equal in each type of scaffold. The col-spo provided superior tensile strength compared with the PP-sca (p<0.01). Conclusion: Overall, the col-spo seems to be more suitable for TSR. It may become a clinical alternative in the future to achieve more satisfying results, concerning function and pain. Level of evidence: Experimental study/case series, Level IV. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a PGA  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Scaffold  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Collagen  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Tendon tissue engineering  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Tendon  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Rotator cuff  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Tear  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Wagenhäuser  |D Markus  |u Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pietschmann  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Docheva  |D Denitsa  |u Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Innenstadt, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gülecyüz  |D Mehmet  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jansson  |D Volkmar  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Müller  |D Peter  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/4(2015-04-01), 1239-1246  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:4<1239  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2820-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2820-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wagenhäuser  |D Markus  |u Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Pietschmann  |D Matthias  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Docheva  |D Denitsa  |u Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Innenstadt, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Gülecyüz  |D Mehmet  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Jansson  |D Volkmar  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Müller  |D Peter  |u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 23/4(2015-04-01), 1239-1246  |x 0942-2056  |q 23:4<1239  |1 2015  |2 23  |o 167