Sex differences in territorial defense in a shell-breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus multifasciatus

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Piyumika Suriyampola, Perri Eason]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
acta ethologica, 18/1(2015-02-01), 59-68
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605462402
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605462402
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100248.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8 
245 0 0 |a Sex differences in territorial defense in a shell-breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus multifasciatus  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Piyumika Suriyampola, Perri Eason] 
520 3 |a Most studies of territorial defense focus on responses of either male or female residents but not both. In a laboratory study of Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a territorial, shell-inhabiting cichlid from Lake Tanganyika, we altered the distribution of shells to manipulate defense costs and examined resident pairs' behavioral responses to intruders. Given that defense costs are lower when territories are separated by visually distinctive structures, we used the presence/absence of a buffer zone, an area of bare sand, to alter defense costs. With a buffer zone, males and females invested 10.4 and 5.4% of their time in defense, respectively. Without a buffer zone, males increased time in defense (30.1%) more than did females (6.6%). Females rarely performed highly aggressive acts; males performed such acts more frequently against male intruders than against female intruders and when there was no buffer zone. Overall, intrasexual aggression was more frequent, and males interacted with a greater proportion of same-sex intruders (71.6%) than did females (33.4%). Without a buffer zone, the proportion of intruders with which the males interacted increased with the number of intrusions. This was not the case for females or for either sex when a buffer zone was present. These findings show that males and females responded differently to changes in shell distribution. We interpret this finding as a sex difference in response to altered defense costs. The stronger tendency of males to intrude when a buffer zone was absent indicates that the shell-free area between territories may have acted as a visual landmark that reduced intrusions by neighboring territory holders. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA, 2014 
690 7 |a Territorial defense  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Defense costs  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Sex difference  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Buffer zone  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cichlid  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Suriyampola  |D Piyumika  |u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 40292, Louisville, KY, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Eason  |D Perri  |u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 40292, Louisville, KY, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t acta ethologica  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/1(2015-02-01), 59-68  |x 0873-9749  |q 18:1<59  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10211 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Suriyampola  |D Piyumika  |u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 40292, Louisville, KY, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Eason  |D Perri  |u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 40292, Louisville, KY, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t acta ethologica  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 18/1(2015-02-01), 59-68  |x 0873-9749  |q 18:1<59  |1 2015  |2 18  |o 10211