<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605462410</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100248.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10211-014-0181-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10211-014-0181-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">What is the stimulus for the excavation of fungus chamber in leaf-cutting ants?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Roberto da Silva Camargo, Luiz Forti]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This study investigated the stimulus for the excavation of fungus chamber by leaf-cutting ants (Atta sexdens rubropilosa) during nest building. Thus, it was hypothesized that the fungus garden or the brood is a stimulus for excavating the chamber. Therefore, four treatments were designed: treatment 1, fixed number of workers (30), without the fungus garden and brood; treatment 2, fixed number of workers (30), with fungus garden (average weight 1.5g) and without brood; treatment 3, fixed number of workers (30), without the fungus garden and with brood (30 larvae or pupae); and treatment 4, fixed number of workers (30), with fungus garden (average weight 1.5g) and brood items (30 larvae or pupae). The variables studied were (a) morphological structure parameters (size and thickness of tunnels and the chamber formed (in centimeters)), (b) workers' excavation flow, and (c) soil volume excavated every 24h. As expected, the results support the hypothesis that the fungus garden and brood are a stimulus for excavating the chamber. The hypothesis is confirmed by the absence of a functional structure, such as a chamber, when the symbiotic fungus and brood are absent. We can then conclude that the presence of the fungus garden and brood stimulate the workers to a greater excavation activity, resulting in functional structures such as tunnels and chamber.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Atta sexdens rubropilosa</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Digging behavior</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Leaf-cutting ants</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Nest excavation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">da Silva Camargo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roberto</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratório de Insetos Sociais-Praga, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, PO Box 237, 18610-307, Botucatu, SP, Brazil</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Forti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Luiz</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratório de Insetos Sociais-Praga, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, PO Box 237, 18610-307, Botucatu, SP, Brazil</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">acta ethologica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(2015-02-01), 31-35</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0873-9749</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;31</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10211</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0181-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0181-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">da Silva Camargo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roberto</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratório de Insetos Sociais-Praga, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, PO Box 237, 18610-307, Botucatu, SP, Brazil</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Forti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Luiz</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratório de Insetos Sociais-Praga, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, PO Box 237, 18610-307, Botucatu, SP, Brazil</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">acta ethologica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(2015-02-01), 31-35</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0873-9749</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;31</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10211</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
