<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605464073</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100256.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10499-014-9805-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10499-014-9805-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative performance of wild juvenile mud crab ( Scylla serrata ) in different culture systems in East Africa: effect of shelter, crab size and stocking density</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[David Mirera, Per-Olav Moksnes]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grow-out culture of mud crabs Scylla serrata in East Africa is at an earlier development phase and is dependent on wild seed crabs. We assessed three different culture systems (net cages, ponds and pens) in three treatments (shelter, size and density) to evaluate survival and growth in small-scale culture of mud crabs in Kenya. In small nursery cages, we assessed how availability of shelter, stocking density and size-class separation affected cannibalistic rates in small juveniles (20-80mm internal carapace width) in 7-day experiments. The result indicated that shelter and size-class separation decreased cannibalism and mortality with 26 and 31%, respectively, whereas no significant effect was found for different stocking densities. Earthen ponds and mangrove pens were used to compare growth and survival in long-term studies (2-4months) in the presence and absence of shelter. Treatments with and without shelter yielded low overall recovery of crabs (4-26%) indicating high mortality rates, and there was no significant effect of shelter or culture system on survival. In contrast, growth rate was high in both pens and ponds, but significantly lower in pen systems without shelter. Generally, the results indicated that cannibalism is the largest source of mortality in different culture systems (net cages, ponds and pens), and use of shelter and size grading of crabs improved survival significantly. In contrast, growth rates were high and comparable to natural growth in both pond and pen culture when shelter was provided. Using growth models to compare growth and survival in mud crabs from aquaculture studies in the literature, we show that shelter may have a stronger effect on growth than has been previously thought, whereas crab density appears to impact more on crab survival. Thus, improving survival in grow-out culture systems is a challenge that remains to be solved for small-scale mud crab culture in East Africa.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mud crab</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Net cages</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ponds</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pens</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Shelter</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Density</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Survival</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Growth</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mirera</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), P.O. Box 81651, Mombasa, Kenya</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moksnes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Per-Olav</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Box 461, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Aquaculture International</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2015-02-01), 155-173</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0967-6120</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;155</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10499</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9805-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9805-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Mirera</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), P.O. Box 81651, Mombasa, Kenya</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Moksnes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Per-Olav</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Box 461, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Aquaculture International</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer International Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2015-02-01), 155-173</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0967-6120</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;155</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10499</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
