Uncertainty from sample preparation in the laboratory on the example of various feeds

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Waldemar Korol, Grażyna Bielecka, Jolanta Rubaj, Sławomir Walczyński]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605465444
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605465444
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100302.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x 
245 0 0 |a Uncertainty from sample preparation in the laboratory on the example of various feeds  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Waldemar Korol, Grażyna Bielecka, Jolanta Rubaj, Sławomir Walczyński] 
520 3 |a A way of uncertainty calculation from test sample preparation in the laboratory was presented on the example of feeds. The essence of the proposal lies in separating two components of results' variability expressed as coefficient of variation CV p: analytical variability CV a (repeatability) and technical variability CV h corresponding with the inhomogeneity of a component. The law of Gauss's error propagation was used. Analytical variability CV a was calculated from the range of duplicate analyses, following Nordtest Handbook. It was assumed that the coefficient of technical variability CV h is the measure of the standard uncertainty from sample preparation in the uncertainty budget of a method u s+h, and expanded uncertainty U s+h for k=2 (P=95%) can be easily calculated as U s+h= 2 u s+h. Calculated uncertainties with uncertainties from sample preparation for loose feed and no ground premixture have increased from 4 to 125% and were higher than analytical uncertainties calculated acc. to GUM during validation of methods. In the case of granulated feed mixture, the obtained uncertainties were similar. Grinding the premix results in lower uncertainties. Uncertainty from sample preparation should be taken into account in the uncertainty budget of a test method, especially in the case of inhomogeneity of tested materials. 
540 |a The Author(s), 2015 
690 7 |a Sample preparation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Analytical variability  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Technical variability  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Uncertainty  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Feedingstuffs  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Korol  |D Waldemar  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bielecka  |D Grażyna  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rubaj  |D Jolanta  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Walczyński  |D Sławomir  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Accreditation and Quality Assurance  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66  |x 0949-1775  |q 20:1<61  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 769 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Korol  |D Waldemar  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bielecka  |D Grażyna  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Rubaj  |D Jolanta  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Walczyński  |D Sławomir  |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Accreditation and Quality Assurance  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66  |x 0949-1775  |q 20:1<61  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 769