Uncertainty from sample preparation in the laboratory on the example of various feeds
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Waldemar Korol, Grażyna Bielecka, Jolanta Rubaj, Sławomir Walczyński]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605465444 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100302.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150201xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Uncertainty from sample preparation in the laboratory on the example of various feeds |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Waldemar Korol, Grażyna Bielecka, Jolanta Rubaj, Sławomir Walczyński] |
| 520 | 3 | |a A way of uncertainty calculation from test sample preparation in the laboratory was presented on the example of feeds. The essence of the proposal lies in separating two components of results' variability expressed as coefficient of variation CV p: analytical variability CV a (repeatability) and technical variability CV h corresponding with the inhomogeneity of a component. The law of Gauss's error propagation was used. Analytical variability CV a was calculated from the range of duplicate analyses, following Nordtest Handbook. It was assumed that the coefficient of technical variability CV h is the measure of the standard uncertainty from sample preparation in the uncertainty budget of a method u s+h, and expanded uncertainty U s+h for k=2 (P=95%) can be easily calculated as U s+h= 2 u s+h. Calculated uncertainties with uncertainties from sample preparation for loose feed and no ground premixture have increased from 4 to 125% and were higher than analytical uncertainties calculated acc. to GUM during validation of methods. In the case of granulated feed mixture, the obtained uncertainties were similar. Grinding the premix results in lower uncertainties. Uncertainty from sample preparation should be taken into account in the uncertainty budget of a test method, especially in the case of inhomogeneity of tested materials. | |
| 540 | |a The Author(s), 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Sample preparation |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Analytical variability |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Technical variability |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Uncertainty |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Feedingstuffs |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Korol |D Waldemar |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bielecka |D Grażyna |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rubaj |D Jolanta |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Walczyński |D Sławomir |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Accreditation and Quality Assurance |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66 |x 0949-1775 |q 20:1<61 |1 2015 |2 20 |o 769 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Korol |D Waldemar |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Bielecka |D Grażyna |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Rubaj |D Jolanta |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Walczyński |D Sławomir |u National Research Institute of Animal Production, National Laboratory for Feedingstuffs, St. Chmielna 2, 20-079, Lublin, Poland |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Accreditation and Quality Assurance |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 61-66 |x 0949-1775 |q 20:1<61 |1 2015 |2 20 |o 769 | ||