<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605466149</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100305.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00769-014-1101-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00769-014-1101-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Validation of a quantitative analytical method based on the effective magnetic moment and the Curie-Weiss law</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Nobuhiro Matsumoto, Takuya Shimosaka]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Curie-Weiss law has been applied to develop a quantitative analytical method referred to as the &quot;effective magnetic moment method” without the use of any reference material for determining the &quot;amount of substance.” This nondestructive and non-separation analytical method was validated by using samples of gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) mixed in silicon oxide. Prior to validation, the magnetic field strength, temperature, and magnetic moment [measured with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) as magnetometer] were calibrated to improve the accuracy of results obtained by this analytical method, using a nuclear magnetic resonance probe magnetometer with a custom-made probe, a platinum resistance thermometer, and a standard reference material of known magnetic moment. For regression analysis of magnetic moment and temperature data, the values of three unknown parameters and their uncertainties were calculated by using a custom-made program based on the nonlinear least-squares method. In the validation results, the relative difference between the mass fractions of Gd2O3 in mixture samples obtained by this method and those obtained by gravimetric blending was approximately 2%, when the mass fraction of Gd2O3 ranged from 0.04kgkg−1 to 1kgkg−1 and the mass of the sample ranged from 17mg to 62mg. The uncertainty of the mass fraction was approximately 5%, as evaluated by this analytical method. A prevalent source of uncertainty in this method is the reproducibility of measured magnetic moments in the SQUID.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Potential primary direct method</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Paramagnetism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Diamagnetism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Magnetometer</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Inorganic analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Matsumoto</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nobuhiro</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Central-3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shimosaka</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Takuya</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Central-3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Accreditation and Quality Assurance</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/2(2015-04-01), 115-124</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-1775</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:2&lt;115</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">769</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1101-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1101-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Matsumoto</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nobuhiro</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Central-3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shimosaka</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Takuya</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Central-3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Accreditation and Quality Assurance</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/2(2015-04-01), 115-124</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-1775</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:2&lt;115</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">769</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
