<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605466203</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100306.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00769-015-1111-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00769-015-1111-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hening</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Teledyne RD Instruments, 14020 Stowe Drive, 92064, Poway, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal estimator for uncertainty-based measurement quality control</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Hening Huang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper presents an optimal estimator for uncertainty-based measurement quality control. The optimal estimator is developed based on an acceptance probability approach under a risk balance criterion. It yields a balance between the false acceptance and false rejection when the measurement quality index is equal to unity. This paper also presents a minimum mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) estimator and a minimum mean squared percentage error estimator based on the frequentist decision-theoretic approach. The mathematical formulations for computing the MAPE, relative bias error (RBE), relative precision error (RPE), and root mean squared percentage error (RMSPE) of the three presented estimators and five existing estimators are derived. The performance of these estimators are compared and evaluated in terms of the false acceptance/rejection probability, MAPE, RBE, RPE, and RMSPE. Among the eight estimators considered, the presented optimal estimator is the most meaningful and the best estimator from the measurement quality control perspective.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Measurement quality control</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Small samples</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Uncertainty estimator</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Accreditation and Quality Assurance</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/2(2015-04-01), 97-106</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-1775</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:2&lt;97</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">769</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1111-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1111-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Huang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hening</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Teledyne RD Instruments, 14020 Stowe Drive, 92064, Poway, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Accreditation and Quality Assurance</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/2(2015-04-01), 97-106</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-1775</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:2&lt;97</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">769</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
