<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605470219</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100326.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150801xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00500-014-1432-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00500-014-1432-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Distribution-based invariant feature construction using genetic programming for edge detection</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Wenlong Fu, Mark Johnston, Mengjie Zhang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In edge detection, constructing features with rich responses on different types of edges is a challenging problem. Genetic programming (GP) has been previously employed to construct features. Normally, the values of the features constructed by GP are calculated from raw observations. Some existing work has considered the distributions of the raw observations, but these features only poorly indicate class label probabilities. To construct features with rich responses on different types of edges, the distributions of the observations from GP programs are investigated in this study. The values of the constructed features are obtained from estimated distributions, rather than directly using the observations. These features themselves indicate probabilities for the target labels. Basic rotation-invariant features from gradients, image quality, and local histograms are used to construct new composite features. The results show that the invariant features constructed by GP combine advantages from the basic features, reduce drawbacks from basic features alone, and improve the detection performance. In terms of the quantitative and qualitative evaluations, features constructed by GP with distribution estimation are better than the combinations from a Bayesian model and a linear support vector machine approach.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Edge detection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Genetic programming</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Distribution estimation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Feature extraction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wenlong</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Johnston</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Zhang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mengjie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Soft Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/8(2015-08-01), 2371-2389</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1432-7643</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:8&lt;2371</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">500</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1432-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1432-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wenlong</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Johnston</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Zhang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mengjie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Soft Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">19/8(2015-08-01), 2371-2389</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1432-7643</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">19:8&lt;2371</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">19</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">500</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
