Science Generates Limit Paradoxes
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Eric Dietrich, Chris Fields]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Axiomathes, 25/4(2015-12-01), 409-432
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605475261 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100351.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10516-015-9267-x |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10516-015-9267-x | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Science Generates Limit Paradoxes |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Eric Dietrich, Chris Fields] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The sciences occasionally generate discoveries that undermine their own assumptions. Two such discoveries are characterized here: the discovery of apophenia by cognitive psychology and the discovery that physical systems cannot be locally bounded within quantum theory. It is shown that such discoveries have a common structure and that this common structure is an instance of Priest's well-known Inclosure Schema. This demonstrates that science itself is dialetheic: it generates limit paradoxes. How science proceeds despite this fact is briefly discussed, as is the connection between our results and the realism-antirealism debate. We conclude by suggesting a position of epistemic modesty. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Apophenia |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Dialetheism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Psychology |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Quantum measurement |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Realism |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Scientific knowledge |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dietrich |D Eric |u Department of Philosophy, Binghamton University, 13902, Binghamton, NY, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fields |D Chris |u 528 Zinnia Court, 95476, Sonoma, CA, USA |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Axiomathes |d Springer Netherlands |g 25/4(2015-12-01), 409-432 |x 1122-1151 |q 25:4<409 |1 2015 |2 25 |o 10516 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9267-x |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9267-x |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Dietrich |D Eric |u Department of Philosophy, Binghamton University, 13902, Binghamton, NY, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Fields |D Chris |u 528 Zinnia Court, 95476, Sonoma, CA, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Axiomathes |d Springer Netherlands |g 25/4(2015-12-01), 409-432 |x 1122-1151 |q 25:4<409 |1 2015 |2 25 |o 10516 | ||