Information transmission in nested sender-receiver games

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Ying Chen, Sidartha Gordon]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Economic Theory, 58/3(2015-04-01), 543-569
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605475660
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605475660
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100353.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00199-014-0831-1  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00199-014-0831-1 
245 0 0 |a Information transmission in nested sender-receiver games  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Ying Chen, Sidartha Gordon] 
520 3 |a We introduce a "nestedness” relation for a general class of sender-receiver games and compare equilibrium properties, in particular the amount of information transmitted, across games that are nested. Roughly, game $$B$$ B is nested in game $$A$$ A if the players' optimal actions are closer in game $$B$$ B . We show that under some conditions, more information is transmitted in the nested game in the sense that the receiver's expected equilibrium payoff is higher. The results generalize the comparative statics and welfare comparisons with respect to preferences in the seminal paper of Crawford and Sobel (Econometrica 50(6):1431-1452, 1982). We also derive new results with respect to changes in priors in addition to changes in preferences. We illustrate the usefulness of the results in three applications: (i) delegation to an intermediary with a different prior, (ii) the choice between centralization and delegation, and (iii) two-way communication with an informed principal. 
540 |a Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014 
690 7 |a Sender-receiver games  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Information transmission  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Nestedness  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Intermediary  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Delegation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Informed principal  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Chen  |D Ying  |u Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St, 21218, Baltimore, MD, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gordon  |D Sidartha  |u Department of Economics, Sciences Po, 28 rue des Saints-Pères, 75007, Paris, France  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Economic Theory  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 58/3(2015-04-01), 543-569  |x 0938-2259  |q 58:3<543  |1 2015  |2 58  |o 199 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-014-0831-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-014-0831-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Chen  |D Ying  |u Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St, 21218, Baltimore, MD, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Gordon  |D Sidartha  |u Department of Economics, Sciences Po, 28 rue des Saints-Pères, 75007, Paris, France  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Economic Theory  |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |g 58/3(2015-04-01), 543-569  |x 0938-2259  |q 58:3<543  |1 2015  |2 58  |o 199