Nested case-control studies: should one break the matching?
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605476136 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100355.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10985-015-9319-y |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10985-015-9319-y | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Nested case-control studies: should one break the matching? |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Ørnulf Borgan, Ruth Keogh] |
| 520 | 3 | |a In a nested case-control study, controls are selected for each case from the individuals who are at risk at the time at which the case occurs. We say that the controls are matched on study time. To adjust for possible confounding, it is common to match on other variables as well. The standard analysis of nested case-control data is based on a partial likelihood which compares the covariates of each case to those of its matched controls. It has been suggested that one may break the matching of nested case-control data and analyse them as case-cohort data using an inverse probability weighted (IPW) pseudo likelihood. Further, when some covariates are available for all individuals in the cohort, multiple imputation (MI) makes it possible to use all available data in the cohort. In the paper we review the standard method and the IPW and MI approaches, and compare their performance using simulations that cover a range of scenarios, including one and two endpoints. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Case-cohort |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Competing risks |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Cox regression |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Inverse probability weighting |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Matching |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Multiple imputation |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Nested case-control |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Borgan |D Ørnulf |u Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O.Box 1053, 0316, Oslo, Norway |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keogh |D Ruth |u Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Lifetime Data Analysis |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com |g 21/4(2015-10-01), 517-541 |x 1380-7870 |q 21:4<517 |1 2015 |2 21 |o 10985 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-015-9319-y |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-015-9319-y |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Borgan |D Ørnulf |u Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O.Box 1053, 0316, Oslo, Norway |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Keogh |D Ruth |u Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Lifetime Data Analysis |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com |g 21/4(2015-10-01), 517-541 |x 1380-7870 |q 21:4<517 |1 2015 |2 21 |o 10985 | ||