<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605478341</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100405.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10994-015-5504-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10994-015-5504-1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimised probabilistic active learning (OPAL)</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">For fast, non-myopic, cost-sensitive active classification</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Georg Krempl, Daniel Kottke, Vincent Lemaire]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In contrast to ever increasing volumes of automatically generated data, human annotation capacities remain limited. Thus, fast active learning approaches that allow the efficient allocation of annotation efforts gain in importance. Furthermore, cost-sensitive applications such as fraud detection pose the additional challenge of differing misclassification costs between classes. Unfortunately, the few existing cost-sensitive active learning approaches rely on time-consuming steps, such as performing self-labelling or tedious evaluations over samples. We propose a fast, non-myopic, and cost-sensitive probabilistic active learning approach for binary classification. Our approach computes the expected reduction in misclassification loss in a labelling candidate's neighbourhood. We derive and use a closed-form solution for this expectation, which considers the possible values of the true posterior of the positive class at the candidate's position, its possible label realisations, and the given labelling budget. The resulting myopic algorithm runs in the same linear asymptotic time as uncertainty sampling, while its non-myopic counterpart requires an additional factor of $$O(m \cdot \log m)$$ O ( m · log m ) in the budget size. The experimental evaluation on several synthetic and real-world data sets shows competitive or better classification performance and runtime, compared to several uncertainty sampling- and error-reduction-based active learning strategies, both in cost-sensitive and cost-insensitive settings.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Author(s), 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Active learning</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Non-myopic</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cost-sensitive</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Unequal misclassification costs</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Misclassification loss</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Imbalanced data</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Uncertainty sampling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Error reduction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Krempl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Georg</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">KMD Lab, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kottke</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Daniel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">KMD Lab, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lemaire</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Vincent</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Orange Labs, Lannion, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Machine Learning</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">100/2-3(2015-09-01), 449-476</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0885-6125</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">100:2-3&lt;449</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10994</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-015-5504-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-015-5504-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Krempl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Georg</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">KMD Lab, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kottke</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Daniel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">KMD Lab, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lemaire</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Vincent</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Orange Labs, Lannion, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Machine Learning</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">100/2-3(2015-09-01), 449-476</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0885-6125</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">100:2-3&lt;449</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10994</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
