Nanotechnology, neuromodulation & the immune response: Discourse, materiality & ethics

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Joseph Fins]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Biomedical Microdevices, 17/2(2015-04-01), 1-6
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60548032X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60548032X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100414.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10544-015-9934-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10544-015-9934-0 
100 1 |a Fins  |D Joseph  |u Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, 435 East 70th Street, Suite 4-J, 10021, New York, NY, USA  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Nanotechnology, neuromodulation & the immune response: Discourse, materiality & ethics  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Joseph Fins] 
520 3 |a Drawing upon the American Pragmatic tradition in philosophy and the more recent work of philosopher Karen Barad, this paper examines how scientific problems are both obscured, and resolved by our use of language describing the natural world. Using the example of the immune response engendered by neural implants inserted in the brain, the author explains how this discourse has been altered by the advent of nanotechnology methods and devices which offer putative remedies that might temper the immune response in the central nervous system. This emergent nanotechnology has altered this problem space and catalyzed one scientific community to acknowledge a material reality that was always present, if not fully acknowledged. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Nanotechnology  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Neuromodulation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Immune response  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ethics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Neuroethics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Discourse  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Materials  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a NanoGagliato  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Karen Barad  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Biomedical Microdevices  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 17/2(2015-04-01), 1-6  |x 1387-2176  |q 17:2<1  |1 2015  |2 17  |o 10544 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9934-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9934-0  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Fins  |D Joseph  |u Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, 435 East 70th Street, Suite 4-J, 10021, New York, NY, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Biomedical Microdevices  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 17/2(2015-04-01), 1-6  |x 1387-2176  |q 17:2<1  |1 2015  |2 17  |o 10544