Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605483434 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100431.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150901xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2254-0 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2254-0 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Andrew Abela, Ryan Shea] |
| 520 | 3 | |a While many scholars agree that the "separation thesis” (Freeman in Bus Ethics Quart 4(4):409-421, 1994)—that business issues and ethical issues can be neatly compartmentalized—is harmful to business ethics scholarship and practice, they also conclude that eliminating it is either inadvisable because of the usefulness of the positive/normative distinction, or actually impossible. Based on an exploration of the fact/value dichotomy and the pragmatist and virtue theoretic responses to it, we develop an approach to eliminating the separation thesis that integrates "business” with "ethics” while still permitting a positive/normative distinction, which we call "ethics from observation.” | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Separation thesis |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Virtue theory |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Positive/normative distinction |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Fact/value dichotomy |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abela |D Andrew |u School of Business & Economics, The Catholic University of America, 20064, Washington, DC, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shea |D Ryan |u School of Philosophy, The Catholic University of America, 20064, Washington, DC, USA |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 131/1(2015-09-01), 31-41 |x 0167-4544 |q 131:1<31 |1 2015 |2 131 |o 10551 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2254-0 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2254-0 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Abela |D Andrew |u School of Business & Economics, The Catholic University of America, 20064, Washington, DC, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Shea |D Ryan |u School of Philosophy, The Catholic University of America, 20064, Washington, DC, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 131/1(2015-09-01), 31-41 |x 0167-4544 |q 131:1<31 |1 2015 |2 131 |o 10551 | ||