Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Benedict Sheehy]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 131/3(2015-10-01), 625-648
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605483663
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605483663
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100432.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x 
100 1 |a Sheehy  |D Benedict  |u Graduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Benedict Sheehy] 
520 3 |a The ubiquity of the term CSR threatens its carrying any distinctive meaning. Despite its long history no consensus has been developed among the industry participants, academics or other interested parties. After a careful review of the complications and complexities of the CSR debate and distinct disciplinary definitions, the article turns to approach the problem of definition using the philosophy of science. It applies a scientific definitional approach of genus, differentia and species to arrive at a definition of CSR as international private business self-regulation. The article provides an overview of the implications of this definition on CSR as a field of study, a management practice and an approach to improving the dialogue concerning the social contribution of business. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a CSR  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Regulation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Self-regulation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Private law  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Private politics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Definitions  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Philosophy of knowledge  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 131/3(2015-10-01), 625-648  |x 0167-4544  |q 131:3<625  |1 2015  |2 131  |o 10551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Sheehy  |D Benedict  |u Graduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 131/3(2015-10-01), 625-648  |x 0167-4544  |q 131:3<625  |1 2015  |2 131  |o 10551