The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605484007 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100434.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2280-y |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2280-y | ||
| 245 | 0 | 4 | |a The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Yijing Wang, Guido Berens] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The goal of this paper was to investigate whether and how a firm that engages in different kinds of corporate social performance (CSP) can create a favorable corporate reputation among its stakeholders, and as a result achieve a good financial performance. Building on stakeholder theory, we distinguish two types of reputation—reputation among public stakeholders and reputation among financial stakeholders. We argue that CSP activities affect these two reputations differently. In addition, we empirically test the relationship among different types of CSP, reputation among public and financial stakeholders, and financial performance. Our results suggest that (1) Carroll's four types of CSP (i.e., economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic) affect financial performance differently, and (2) their effects are mediated by reputation among public and financial stakeholders. Our findings provide guidelines for managers on choosing to emphasize certain CSP aspects in their communication, depending on the specific stakeholder group they are targeting. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Corporate social performance |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Corporate reputation |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Financial performance |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Information asymmetry |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Stakeholder management |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang |D Yijing |u TiasNimbas Business School, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berens |D Guido |u Department of Business Society Management, Office T11-46, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 131/2(2015-10-01), 337-359 |x 0167-4544 |q 131:2<337 |1 2015 |2 131 |o 10551 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2280-y |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2280-y |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Wang |D Yijing |u TiasNimbas Business School, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Berens |D Guido |u Department of Business Society Management, Office T11-46, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 131/2(2015-10-01), 337-359 |x 0167-4544 |q 131:2<337 |1 2015 |2 131 |o 10551 | ||