Revisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost from Bangladesh

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Afzalur Rashid]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 130/1(2015-08-01), 181-198
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605484074
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605484074
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100434.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y 
100 1 |a Rashid  |D Afzalur  |u School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, 4350, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost from Bangladesh  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Afzalur Rashid] 
520 3 |a This study examines the influence of board independence on firm agency cost among listed firms in Bangladesh, which feature concentrated ownership and high insider representation on corporate boards. This study uses three measures of agency cost: the ‘expense ratio', the ‘Q-free cash flow interaction' and the ‘asset utilization ratio'. The finding of the study is that board independence can reduce the firm agency cost only under ‘asset utilization ratio' measure of agency cost. These findings are robust to several robustness tests. Furthermore, the non-linearity tests suggest that the benefit of outside independent directors is generally plausible as a factor controlling agency costs in the case of a medium level of board independence. Overall, these findings do not reject the validity of agency theory, supporting the Anglo-American orthodoxy promoting outside independent directors as good monitors. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Agency theory  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Board independence  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Resource dependence theory  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Stewardship theory  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 130/1(2015-08-01), 181-198  |x 0167-4544  |q 130:1<181  |1 2015  |2 130  |o 10551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Rashid  |D Afzalur  |u School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, 4350, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 130/1(2015-08-01), 181-198  |x 0167-4544  |q 130:1<181  |1 2015  |2 130  |o 10551