Turning Inward or Focusing Out? Navigating Theories of Interpersonal and Ethical Cognitions to Understand Ethical Decision-Making
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Lumina Albert, Scott Reynolds, Bulent Turan]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 130/2(2015-08-01), 467-484
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605484538 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100436.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Turning Inward or Focusing Out? Navigating Theories of Interpersonal and Ethical Cognitions to Understand Ethical Decision-Making |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Lumina Albert, Scott Reynolds, Bulent Turan] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The literature on ethical decision-making is rooted in a cognitive perspective that emphasizes the role of moral judgment. Recent research in interpersonal dynamics, however, has suggested that ethics revolves around an individual's perceptions and views of others. We draw from both literatures to propose and empirically examine a contingent model. We theorize that whether the individual relies on cognitions about the ethical issue or perceptions of others depends on the level of social consensus surrounding the issue. We test our hypotheses in three studies. Results suggest that not only does social consensus determine whether an individual relies on ethical cognitions about the issue or perceptions of others, but also that an individual's view of self is an important moderator in these relationships. We conclude by considering implications of this research for theory and practice. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Ethical judgment |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Interpersonal relationships |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Ethical decision-making |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Ethical behavior |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a View of others |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a View of self |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Albert |D Lumina |u College of Business, Colorado State University, 80523-1275, Fort Collins, CO, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reynolds |D Scott |u Foster School of Business, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, WA, USA |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Turan |D Bulent |u Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, 35294, Birmingham, AL, USA |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 130/2(2015-08-01), 467-484 |x 0167-4544 |q 130:2<467 |1 2015 |2 130 |o 10551 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Albert |D Lumina |u College of Business, Colorado State University, 80523-1275, Fort Collins, CO, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Reynolds |D Scott |u Foster School of Business, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, WA, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Turan |D Bulent |u Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, 35294, Birmingham, AL, USA |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 130/2(2015-08-01), 467-484 |x 0167-4544 |q 130:2<467 |1 2015 |2 130 |o 10551 | ||