The Inexorable Sociality of Commerce: The Individual and Others in Adam Smith

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[David Bevan, Patricia Werhane]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 127/2(2015-03-01), 327-335
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60548564X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60548564X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100442.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150301xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10551-013-2042-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-013-2042-2 
245 0 4 |a The Inexorable Sociality of Commerce: The Individual and Others in Adam Smith  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [David Bevan, Patricia Werhane] 
520 3 |a In this paper we reconsider Adam Smith's ethics, what he means by self-interest and the role this plays in the famous "invisible hand.” Our efforts focus in part on the misreading of "the invisible hand” by certain economists with a view to legitimizing their neoclassical economic paradigm. Through exegesis and by reference to notions that are developed in Smith's two major works, we deconstruct Smith's ideas of conscience, justice, self-interest, and the invisible hand. We amplify Smith's insistence, through his notions of the virtues, that as human beings, and by analogy, organizations, we are intrinsically social, rather than selfish and or egoistically self-centered. Thus, we have responsibilities to and because of others. We conclude that such a managerialist preoccupation with shareholder value is challenged, if not completely refuted, by taking seriously the social character of Smith's complex vision of commerce. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Adam Smith  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Self-interest  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a The invisible hand fallacy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a The sociality of commerce  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Bevan  |D David  |u CEIBS, Shanghai, People's Republic of China  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Werhane  |D Patricia  |u The Institute for Business & Professional Ethics, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 127/2(2015-03-01), 327-335  |x 0167-4544  |q 127:2<327  |1 2015  |2 127  |o 10551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2042-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2042-2  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bevan  |D David  |u CEIBS, Shanghai, People's Republic of China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Werhane  |D Patricia  |u The Institute for Business & Professional Ethics, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 127/2(2015-03-01), 327-335  |x 0167-4544  |q 127:2<327  |1 2015  |2 127  |o 10551