Exploring the Transition to Integrated Reporting Through a Practice Lens: An Australian Customer Owned Bank Perspective
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 605485887 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20210128100443.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210128e20150701xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lodhia |D Sumit |u University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Exploring the Transition to Integrated Reporting Through a Practice Lens: An Australian Customer Owned Bank Perspective |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Sumit Lodhia] |
| 520 | 3 | |a This article explores the transition to integrated reporting by a customer-owned bank (referred to as Goodbank) and identifies the drivers of this transition, thereby providing insights for other businesses seeking to engage in such reporting. Practice theory provides a theoretical lens for this study. A case study approach encompassing in-depth interviews and documents analysis enabled the data to be collected for this research. This study finds that a customer-owned business context enables innovative approaches to reporting. An understanding of reporting and recognition of the potential value of integrated reporting, basic guidelines for such a practice, and organisational ethical values and goals based on a combination of economic, social and environmental considerations matched by an organisational structure that embeds economic, social and environmental responsibilities rather than treating these as separate silos, enabled Goodbank to transition to integrated reporting and differentiate itself from its competitors and other organisations. | |
| 540 | |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Environmental |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Economic |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Financial |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Integrated reporting |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Practice |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Social |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Stakeholders |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Sustainability |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 129/3(2015-07-01), 585-598 |x 0167-4544 |q 129:3<585 |1 2015 |2 129 |o 10551 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence |2 nationallicence | |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-springer | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Lodhia |D Sumit |u University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Business Ethics |d Springer Netherlands |g 129/3(2015-07-01), 585-598 |x 0167-4544 |q 129:3<585 |1 2015 |2 129 |o 10551 | ||