A Worldwide Examination of Exchange Market Quality: Greater Integrity Increases Market Efficiency

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Michael Aitken, Frederick de B. Harris, Shan Ji]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 132/1(2015-11-01), 147-170
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605486336
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605486336
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100445.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2294-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10551-014-2294-5 
245 0 2 |a A Worldwide Examination of Exchange Market Quality: Greater Integrity Increases Market Efficiency  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Michael Aitken, Frederick de B. Harris, Shan Ji] 
520 3 |a We develop a framework for assessing security market quality (MQ), relating five elements of market design to three metrics of market integrity and two metrics of market efficiency. We empirically implement this integrity-efficiency MQ framework by testing a hypothesis that trade-based ramping manipulation at the close (MTC) raises execution costs on 24 security markets worldwide. Estimating a simultaneous equations model of ramping incidence, spreads, and the probability of deploying real-time surveillance (RTS), we show that quoted bid-ask spreads are positively related to the incidence of MTC across seven liquidity deciles. The magnitude is economically significant; improving market integrity by cutting MTC in half reduces spreads 6-11%. Allowing direct market access in conjunction with RTS, conducting auctions at the close, and developing regulations that require surveillance, all reduce MTC and thereby lower spreads, assuring better market integrity and enhancing market efficiency. Introducing circuit breakers or prohibiting shorts poses integrity-efficiency tradeoffs. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014 
690 7 |a Market integrity  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Business ethics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Security market quality  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Market manipulation  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Aitken  |D Michael  |u Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre and Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a de B. Harris  |D Frederick  |u Wake Forest University School of Business, Winston-Salem, NC, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ji  |D Shan  |u Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 132/1(2015-11-01), 147-170  |x 0167-4544  |q 132:1<147  |1 2015  |2 132  |o 10551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2294-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2294-5  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Aitken  |D Michael  |u Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre and Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a de B. Harris  |D Frederick  |u Wake Forest University School of Business, Winston-Salem, NC, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ji  |D Shan  |u Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Business Ethics  |d Springer Netherlands  |g 132/1(2015-11-01), 147-170  |x 0167-4544  |q 132:1<147  |1 2015  |2 132  |o 10551