<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605488452</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100455.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00214-015-1617-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00214-015-1617-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Foroutan-Nejad</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Cina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/A4, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Is NICS a reliable aromaticity index for transition metal clusters?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Cina Foroutan-Nejad]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In the present account the nature of aromaticity/antiaromaticity of fourteen metallic complexes/clusters are reexamined. These species were classified as aromatic by means of different nucleus independent chemical shift (NICS) based approaches, previously. Visualization of the current density and magnetizability of atomic basins reveals that none of the studied systems are magnetic aromatic, i.e. sustain diamagnetic ring current. It is demonstrated that negative NICS values near the ring plane of the studied molecules originates from remarkably strong local paramagnetic current around their transition metal atom nuclei. This phenomenon has been observed only for Sc3 − all-metal cluster but current study demonstrates that the influence of the local paramagnetic currents around transition metal atoms on NICS is a general phenomenon that must be carefully considered prior to classification of the metallic systems as aromatic. Furthermore, this study suggests that NICS is not a reliable aromaticity index for transition-metal clusters/molecules.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Aromaticity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Magnetizability</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Current density</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Transition metals</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">QTAIM</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">NICS</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Theoretical Chemistry Accounts</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">134/2(2015-02-01), 1-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1432-881X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">134:2&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">134</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">214</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1617-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1617-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Foroutan-Nejad</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Cina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/A4, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Theoretical Chemistry Accounts</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">134/2(2015-02-01), 1-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1432-881X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">134:2&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">134</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">214</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
