External validation of existing nomograms predicting lymph node metastases in cystectomized patients

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Miroslav Stojadinovic, Rade Prelevic]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20/1(2015-02-01), 164-170
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605490279
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605490279
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100504.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10147-014-0693-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10147-014-0693-3 
245 0 0 |a External validation of existing nomograms predicting lymph node metastases in cystectomized patients  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Miroslav Stojadinovic, Rade Prelevic] 
520 3 |a Objectives: Karakiewicz et al. and Green et al. created pre-cystectomy nomograms to predict lymph node involvement. The aim of the study was to externally validate these two nomograms in intermediate-volume institutions in Europe. Patients and methods: Data from a Serbian single-centre cystectomy series comprising 183 patients with bladder cancer were used for the validation of two US nomograms, which were originally based on data from 726 and 201 patients, respectively. A multivariate regression model assessed the value of the clinical parameters integrated in the two nomograms. The expected predictive accuracy, calibration and clinical utility according to the nomograms were calculated. Results: Comparison of our dataset with the previously published data shows differences in nearly all underlying risk variables. Overall, 109 (59.6%) patients had lymph node metastases. The analysis demonstrated that hydronephrosis and status of lymph nodes on computed tomography have independent prognostic value. The performance of the nomograms deteriorated from the development set, and the predictive accuracies for the two models showed moderate discriminatory ability (61.2-69.1%). In the decision curve analysis, only the Green et al. model predicting lymph node positivity provided net benefit. Conclusions: The Green et al. nomogram seems applicable to patients from Europe, despite varying risk factors in the validation dataset. Acceptance of such a tool into daily clinical management may lead to more appropriate decision-making. Nevertheless, further improvement and implementation of novel statistical models with enhanced predictive accuracy is needed. 
540 |a Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014 
690 7 |a Bladder cancer  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Radical cystectomy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Lymph node metastasis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Validation study  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a AUC : Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a BC : Bladder cancer  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CI : Confidential interval  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CIS : Carcinoma in situ  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CT : Computed tomography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a LN : Lymph node  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a LN+ : Positive lymph node  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a LR : Logistic regression  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a LVI : Lymphovascular invasion  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a MRI : Magnetic resonance imaging  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a NC : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a NOC : Non organ-confined  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a NPV : Negative predictive value  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a OR : Odds ratio  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a PLND : Pelvic lymph node dissection  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a PPV : Positive predictive value  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a RC : Radical cystectomy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a ROC : Receiver operating characteristic curve  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a TUR : Transurethral resection  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Stojadinovic  |D Miroslav  |u Deparment of Urology, Clinic of Urology and Nephrology, Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Zmaj Jovina 30, 34 000, Kragujevac, Serbia  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Prelevic  |D Rade  |u Military Medical Academy, Clinic of Urology, Belgrade, Serbia  |4 aut 
773 0 |t International Journal of Clinical Oncology  |d Springer Japan  |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 164-170  |x 1341-9625  |q 20:1<164  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 10147 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0693-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0693-3  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Stojadinovic  |D Miroslav  |u Deparment of Urology, Clinic of Urology and Nephrology, Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Zmaj Jovina 30, 34 000, Kragujevac, Serbia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Prelevic  |D Rade  |u Military Medical Academy, Clinic of Urology, Belgrade, Serbia  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t International Journal of Clinical Oncology  |d Springer Japan  |g 20/1(2015-02-01), 164-170  |x 1341-9625  |q 20:1<164  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 10147