Efficacy of palonosetron and 1-day dexamethasone in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy compared with fosaprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone: a prospective randomized crossover study

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Hiromitsu Kitayama, Yasushi Tsuji, Junko Sugiyama, Ayako Doi, Tomohiro Kondo, Michiaki Hirayama]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20/6(2015-12-01), 1051-1056
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60549066X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60549066X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100506.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151201xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s10147-015-0823-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10147-015-0823-6 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy of palonosetron and 1-day dexamethasone in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy compared with fosaprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone: a prospective randomized crossover study  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Hiromitsu Kitayama, Yasushi Tsuji, Junko Sugiyama, Ayako Doi, Tomohiro Kondo, Michiaki Hirayama] 
520 3 |a Background: Although palonosetron (PALO) and NK1 receptor antagonist both reduce chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, no comparison trial in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) had been reported. The purpose of this study was to find out which drug combinations are preferable for patients receiving MEC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients receiving MEC were randomized to two groups; group A first received PALO therapy [PALO plus 1-day dexamethasone (DEX)], and group B first received fosaprepitant (FAPR) therapy [FAPR, granisetron (GRAN), and DEX]. Patients were re-allocated to the other therapy, respectively, for the second cycle of chemotherapy. We administered intravenous PALO (0.75mg) and DEX (9.9mg) to the PALO therapy group, and FAPR (150mg), DEX (4.95mg), and GRAN (3mg) to the FAPR therapy group, on Day 1. Complete response (CR) was the primary endpoint; complete control (CC), total control (CT), and the therapy chosen by the patients for their third and following cycles of antiemetic therapy were the secondary endpoints. We evaluated CR, CC, and TC in the acute phase, in the delayed phase, and over the whole period. Results: A total of 35 patients and 70 cycles of therapy was evaluable for analysis. No significant difference was found at all evaluation points. Overall CR rates for PALO and FAPR therapy were 74 vs 69% (P=0.567), CC rates 66 vs 69% (P=0.521), and TC rates 46 vs 60% (P=0.235), respectively. Patients also showed no clear preference for their third and following cycles of chemotherapy, choosing both regimens almost equally often (PALO 10 vs FAPR 13). Conclusions: PALO and 1-day DEX is almost equivalent to FAPR, GRAN, and DEX for MEC. 
540 |a Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015 
690 7 |a Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Palonosetron  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a 1-Day dexamethasone  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Fosaprepitant  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Granisetron  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Kitayama  |D Hiromitsu  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tsuji  |D Yasushi  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sugiyama  |D Junko  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Doi  |D Ayako  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kondo  |D Tomohiro  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hirayama  |D Michiaki  |u Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Tonan Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
773 0 |t International Journal of Clinical Oncology  |d Springer Japan  |g 20/6(2015-12-01), 1051-1056  |x 1341-9625  |q 20:6<1051  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 10147 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0823-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0823-6  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kitayama  |D Hiromitsu  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Tsuji  |D Yasushi  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Sugiyama  |D Junko  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Doi  |D Ayako  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kondo  |D Tomohiro  |u Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Kita 1 Jo Nishi 6 Chome, Chuo-ku, 060-0001, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Hirayama  |D Michiaki  |u Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Tonan Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t International Journal of Clinical Oncology  |d Springer Japan  |g 20/6(2015-12-01), 1051-1056  |x 1341-9625  |q 20:6<1051  |1 2015  |2 20  |o 10147