Dynamic enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the correlation with cirrhosis and tumor size

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Qing Lu, Li-Yun Xue, Wen-Ping Wang, Bei-Jian Huang, Cui-Xian Li]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/6(2015-08-01), 1558-1566
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605492271
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605492271
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100514.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150801xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-015-0379-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-015-0379-y 
245 0 0 |a Dynamic enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the correlation with cirrhosis and tumor size  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Qing Lu, Li-Yun Xue, Wen-Ping Wang, Bei-Jian Huang, Cui-Xian Li] 
520 3 |a Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the dynamic enhancement pattern of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) of varying sizes and hepatic backgrounds. Materials and methods: CEUS was performed in 98 pathologically confirmed ICCs (n=39<30mm, n=59>30mm; n=45 with cirrhosis and n=53 with normal liver). The dynamic enhancement pattern of CEUS was retrospectively analyzed. Results: In the arterial phase, heterogeneous hyper-enhancement was more frequent in ICCs with cirrhosis (21/45, 46.7% vs. 11/53, 20.8% in ICCs with normal liver, p=0.009), while peripheral hyper-enhancement and hypo-enhancement were more common in ICCs with normal liver (14/53, 26.4%; 11/53, 20.8% vs. 2/45, 4.4%; 2/45, 4.4% in ICCs with cirrhosis, p=0.005 and 0.033, respectively). There were no significant differences between portal and delayed phases. In ICCs<30mm, homogeneous hyper-enhancement was more frequently identified (27/39, 69.2% vs. 10/59, 16.9% in ICCs>30mm, p<0.001), whereas in ICCs>30mm, heterogeneous, and peripheral hyper-enhancement were more commonly observed (26/59, 44.1% vs. 6/39, 15.4% in ICCs<30mm, p=0.004, and 14/59, 23.7% vs. 2/39, 5.1% in ICCs<30mm, p=0.023, respectively). The washout pattern in portal and delayed phases were not significantly different in ICCs with different sizes. 60.7% (17/28) ICCs<30mm and 85.2% (23/27) ICCs>30mm with cirrhosis, together with 66.7% (14/21) ICCs<30mm with normal liver displayed intense contrast agent uptake (homogeneous or heterogeneous hyper-enhancement) in arterial phase followed by washout in portal and delayed phase, which was much higher than that in ICCs>30mm with normal liver (34.4%, 11/32, p<0.001, <0.001 and =0.027, respectively). Conclusion: The CEUS dynamic enhancement pattern of ICC varies with size and hepatic background. The enhancement pattern is indistinguishable from hepatocellular carcinoma on CEUS in most ICCs with cirrhosis and in most ICCs<30mm with normal liver. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ultrasound  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Contrast agent  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cirrhosis  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Lu  |D Qing  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Xue  |D Li-Yun  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wang  |D Wen-Ping  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Huang  |D Bei-Jian  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Li  |D Cui-Xian  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/6(2015-08-01), 1558-1566  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:6<1558  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0379-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0379-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Lu  |D Qing  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Xue  |D Li-Yun  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wang  |D Wen-Ping  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Huang  |D Bei-Jian  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Li  |D Cui-Xian  |u Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, 200032, Shanghai, China  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/6(2015-08-01), 1558-1566  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:6<1558  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261