The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Ferhat Cengel, Mesut Bulakci, Tuba Selcuk, Yildiray Savas, Muhammet Ceyhan, Ayhan Kocak, Cigdem Bilgili]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/7(2015-10-01), 2143-2151
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605493014
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605493014
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100518.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z 
245 0 4 |a The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Ferhat Cengel, Mesut Bulakci, Tuba Selcuk, Yildiray Savas, Muhammet Ceyhan, Ayhan Kocak, Cigdem Bilgili] 
520 3 |a Purpose: This study investigated the sonographic properties of drug packets containing narcotic drugs and the diagnostic role of ultrasonography in detecting body packing in comparison with CT. Methods: Forty-five suspects admitted to our hospital for diagnosis and management were routinely evaluated by non-contrast CT for the presence of drug packets. A single radiologist blind to CT data independently performed the abdominal ultrasonographic scans. Results: Thirty-five of 45 suspects were carrying packets. In positive cases, two types of packets with different properties were noted. Twenty-eight cases had type 1 packets (solid form drug) and 7 had type 2 packets (liquid form cocaine). The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of ultrasonography for detecting drug packets were 91%, 70%, 91%, and 70%, respectively. Ultrasonography accurately determined the presence or absence of packs in 39 of 45 suspects. Conclusion: Ultrasonography was found to have a high sensitivity but a low specificity in suspected cases. A negative ultrasonography cannot rule out the diagnosis of body packing. However, it may be preferred as the initial imaging method or for follow-up of suspected cases as a radiation-free, easy-to-use, and inexpensive technique. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Body packing  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Drug smuggling  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Abdominal ultrasound  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Computed tomography  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Cengel  |D Ferhat  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bulakci  |D Mesut  |u Department of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Selcuk  |D Tuba  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Savas  |D Yildiray  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ceyhan  |D Muhammet  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kocak  |D Ayhan  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bilgili  |D Cigdem  |u Department of Radiology, Bayrampasa State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2143-2151  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2143  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Cengel  |D Ferhat  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bulakci  |D Mesut  |u Department of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Selcuk  |D Tuba  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Savas  |D Yildiray  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ceyhan  |D Muhammet  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kocak  |D Ayhan  |u Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bilgili  |D Cigdem  |u Department of Radiology, Bayrampasa State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2143-2151  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2143  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261