Multidetector CT detection of peritoneal metastases: evaluation of sensitivity between standard 2.5mm axial imaging and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) reconstructions

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Corey Jensen, Rafael Vicens-Rodriguez, Nicolaus Wagner-Bartak, Patricia Fox, Silvana Faria, Ivan Carrion, Aliya Qayyum, Eric Tamm]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/7(2015-10-01), 2167-2172
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605493189
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605493189
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100519.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-015-0370-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-015-0370-7 
245 0 0 |a Multidetector CT detection of peritoneal metastases: evaluation of sensitivity between standard 2.5mm axial imaging and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) reconstructions  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Corey Jensen, Rafael Vicens-Rodriguez, Nicolaus Wagner-Bartak, Patricia Fox, Silvana Faria, Ivan Carrion, Aliya Qayyum, Eric Tamm] 
520 3 |a Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate the sensitivity of multidetector CT for the detection of peritoneal metastases between standard 2.5mm axial imaging and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) reconstructions. Materials and methods: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the need to obtain patient consent. We retrospectively identified 36 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and peritoneal metastatic disease who underwent a pancreatic protocol CT examination of the abdomen and pelvis between January 2012 and January 2014. Three independent radiologists reviewed a randomized combination of standard axial (2.5mm reconstructed thickness, 2.5mm interval) and axial MIP reconstructions (6, 3mm interval) over two sessions. Each reader recorded metastasis location in PACS. Subsequent consensus review by two radiologists determined the final number and size of metastases. Results: The reviewers found 328 peritoneal implants in 36 patients. After accounting for the size, location, and number of lesions as well as multiple readers, a generalized estimating equations model showed that the statistical combination of MIP with standard technique significantly increased the odds of correctly identifying a lesion (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.86-2.51; p value<0.0001) compared to standard technique alone. MIP reconstruction as a standalone technique was less sensitive compared to standard technique alone (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-0.99; p value=0.0468). When compared to standard axial imaging, evaluation via MIP reconstructions resulted in the identification of an additional 50 (15%), 45 (14%), and 55 (17%) lesions by Readers 1-3, respectively. Conclusion: The axial 6mm MIP series is complimentary in the CT evaluation of peritoneal metastases. MIP reconstruction evaluation identified a significant number of additional lesions, but is not adequate as a standalone technique for peritoneal cavity assessment. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a MIP  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Maximum intensity projection  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Peritoneal metastases  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Peritoneal evaluation  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CT  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Jensen  |D Corey  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vicens-Rodriguez  |D Rafael  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wagner-Bartak  |D Nicolaus  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fox  |D Patricia  |u Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Faria  |D Silvana  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Carrion  |D Ivan  |u University Hospital Joan XXIII (Tarragona), Avda. Jaume Balmes, XX, X-X, 08800, Vilanova i la Geltru Barcelona, Spain  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Qayyum  |D Aliya  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tamm  |D Eric  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2167-2172  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2167  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0370-7  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0370-7  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Jensen  |D Corey  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Vicens-Rodriguez  |D Rafael  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wagner-Bartak  |D Nicolaus  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Fox  |D Patricia  |u Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Faria  |D Silvana  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Carrion  |D Ivan  |u University Hospital Joan XXIII (Tarragona), Avda. Jaume Balmes, XX, X-X, 08800, Vilanova i la Geltru Barcelona, Spain  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Qayyum  |D Aliya  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Tamm  |D Eric  |u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Pickens Academic Tower, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2167-2172  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2167  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261