The value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in interdisciplinary treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[U. Attenberger, J. Morelli, J. Budjan, A. Herold, P. Kienle, W. Kleine, A. Häcker, C. Baumann, J. Heinzelbecker, S. Schoenberg, H. Michaely]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/7(2015-10-01), 2242-2247
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605493596
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605493596
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100521.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20151001xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-015-0476-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-015-0476-y 
245 0 4 |a The value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in interdisciplinary treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [U. Attenberger, J. Morelli, J. Budjan, A. Herold, P. Kienle, W. Kleine, A. Häcker, C. Baumann, J. Heinzelbecker, S. Schoenberg, H. Michaely] 
520 3 |a Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of dynamic pelvic floor MRI relative to standard clinical examinations in treatment decisions made by an interdisciplinary team of specialists in a center for pelvic floor dysfunction. Methods: 60 women were referred for dynamic pelvic floor MRI by an interdisciplinary team of specialists of a pelvic floor center. All patients were clinically examined by an urologist, gynecologist, a proctological, and colorectal surgeon. The specialists assessed individually and in consensus, whether (1) MRI provides important additional information not evident by physical examination and in consensus whether (2) MRI influenced the treatment strategy and/or (3) changed management or the surgical procedure. Results: MRI was rated essential to the treatment decision in 22/50 cases, leading to a treatment change in 13 cases. In 12 cases, an enterocele was diagnosed by MRI but was not detected on physical exam. In 4 cases an enterocele and in 2 cases a rectocele were suspected clinically but not confirmed by MRI. In 4 cases, MRI proved critical in assessment of rectocele size. Vaginal intussusception detected on MRI was likewise missed by gynecologic exam in 1 case. Conclusion: MRI allows diagnosis of clinically occult enteroceles, by comprehensively evaluating the interaction between the pelvic floor and viscera. In nearly half of cases, MRI changed management or the surgical approach relative to the clinical evaluation of an interdisciplinary team. Thus, dynamic pelvic floor MRI represents an essential component of the evaluation for pelvic floor disorders. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015 
690 7 |a Dynamic pelvic floor MRI  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Pelvic floor dysfunction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Pelvic floor center  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Rectocele  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Enterocele  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cystocele  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Attenberger  |D U.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Morelli  |D J.  |u Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Budjan  |D J.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Herold  |D A.  |u Enddarmzentrum, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kienle  |D P.  |u Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kleine  |D W.  |u Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Häcker  |D A.  |u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Baumann  |D C.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Heinzelbecker  |D J.  |u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schoenberg  |D S.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Michaely  |D H.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2242-2247  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2242  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0476-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0476-y  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Attenberger  |D U.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Morelli  |D J.  |u Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Budjan  |D J.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Herold  |D A.  |u Enddarmzentrum, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kienle  |D P.  |u Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kleine  |D W.  |u Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Häcker  |D A.  |u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Baumann  |D C.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Heinzelbecker  |D J.  |u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Schoenberg  |D S.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Michaely  |D H.  |u Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/7(2015-10-01), 2242-2247  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:7<2242  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261