Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in assessing hepatic fibrosis: performance in a cohort of patients with histological data

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Mashal Batheja, Hugo Vargas, Annelise Silva, Forrest Walker, Yu-Hui Chang, Giovanni De Petris, Alvin Silva]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/4(2015-04-01), 760-765
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605494142
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605494142
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100524.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-014-0321-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-014-0321-8 
245 0 0 |a Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in assessing hepatic fibrosis: performance in a cohort of patients with histological data  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Mashal Batheja, Hugo Vargas, Annelise Silva, Forrest Walker, Yu-Hui Chang, Giovanni De Petris, Alvin Silva] 
520 3 |a Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare fibrosis seen on liver biopsy to MR elastography (MRE) stiffness measurements in normal controls and patients with abnormal transaminases and chronic liver disease. Methods: The control group consisted of 22 healthy liver transplant donors who by definition had normal transaminases. The patient group (32 patients) was recruited from the Mayo Clinic Arizona hepatobiliary clinic over a 3-year span. All subjects underwent a liver biopsy as part of their evaluation and agreed to MRE within 35days of biopsy. Non-parametric tests were used to compare the MRE-predicted liver fibrosis to the fibrosis noted on liver biopsy. Results: Analysis included 54 subjects (32 patients with chronic liver disease and 22 healthy liver donor candidates). MRE median liver stiffness measurements increased per histologic liver fibrosis stage (one-way ANOVA p=0.001), with significant correlation between increasing fibrosis stage and stiffness values. Median MRE for control group (2.13kPa; mean=2.3±0.6kPa) was significantly lower than for patient group (3.7kPa; mean=4.1±2.1kPa) (p=0.003). Significantly, lower median stiffness was seen in zero-to-moderate (F0-2, n=22) vs. severe fibrosis stages (F3-4, n=10) 2.80 vs. 5.9kPa, respectively (p<0.05). Using a 3.7-kPa cut-off value, the predicted sensitivity and specificity for detecting F0-2 from F3-4 were 91% and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis supports previous findings that MRE is a non-invasive and effective method for detection and assessment of liver fibrosis, particularly for discrimination between F0-2 stages and F3-4 stages. MRE may represent a valuable tool to finely discern hepatic fibrosis non-invasively. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Liver stiffness  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Fibrosis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Cirrhosis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Magnetic resonance elastography  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Batheja  |D Mashal  |u Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vargas  |D Hugo  |u Department of Hepatology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Silva  |D Annelise  |u Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Walker  |D Forrest  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chang  |D Yu-Hui  |u Division of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a De Petris  |D Giovanni  |u Department of Laboratory Medicine/Pathology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Silva  |D Alvin  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/4(2015-04-01), 760-765  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:4<760  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0321-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0321-8  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Batheja  |D Mashal  |u Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Vargas  |D Hugo  |u Department of Hepatology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Silva  |D Annelise  |u Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Walker  |D Forrest  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Chang  |D Yu-Hui  |u Division of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a De Petris  |D Giovanni  |u Department of Laboratory Medicine/Pathology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Silva  |D Alvin  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/4(2015-04-01), 760-765  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:4<760  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261