<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605494614</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100527.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20151001xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-015-0512-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-015-0512-y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Left renal vein compression as cause for varicocele: prevalence and associated findings on contrast-enhanced CT</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Douglas Lewis, Lars Grimm, Charles Kim]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of left renal vein compression in patients with varicoceles. Methods: Abdominal and pelvis contrast-enhanced CT images from 100 male patients with varicoceles (mean age 50.6years) and 100 matched control patients (mean age 49.8years) were retrospectively reviewed. The diameter of the left renal vein was measured as it crosses between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery and was classified as compressed if there was greater than 50% narrowing. The diameter of the left gonadal vein was measured at the origin. Comparison of the prevalence of left renal vein compression was made via a Chi-squared test and the gonadal vein diameter via a t test. Results: The distribution of varicoceles was 68 on the left, 24 bilateral, and 8 on the right. Compression of the left renal vein was significantly more common in the left varicocele (78%, 53/68) than in the bilateral varicocele (42%, 10/24, p=0.002), right varicocele (13%, 1/8, p&lt;0.001), or control group (10%, 10/100, p&lt;0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the gonadal vein diameter was significantly greater in the left varicocele (mean 5.6mm) than in the bilateral varicocele (mean 4.6mm, p=0.018), right varicocele (mean 3.2mm, p&lt;0.001), and control group (mean 3.1mm, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Left renal vein compression by the superior mesenteric artery is a major contributor to left-sided varicoceles.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Varicocele</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Renal vein</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">CT</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Nutcracker</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Gonadal vein</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Superior mesenteric artery</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lewis</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Douglas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grimm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Lars</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kim</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Charles</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Abdominal Imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">40/8(2015-10-01), 3147-3151</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-8925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">40:8&lt;3147</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">261</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0512-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0512-y</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lewis</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Douglas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Grimm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Lars</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kim</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Charles</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, 27710, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Abdominal Imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">40/8(2015-10-01), 3147-3151</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-8925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">40:8&lt;3147</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">261</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
