<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605495300</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100530.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00261-014-0283-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-014-0283-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Detection of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Christian Maegerlein, Alexander Fingerle, Michael Souvatzoglou, Ernst Rummeny, Konstantin Holzapfel]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Purpose: Aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging (MRI) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Methods: A total of 49 patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the liver were included in this study. The MRI protocol included diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging after intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA. PET and MR images were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. Imaging results were correlated with histopathological findings or imaging follow-up as available. Sensitivities of both modalities were compared using McNemar Test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance in correctly identifying liver metastases. Results: A total of 151 metastases were confirmed. For lesion detection, MRI was significantly superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sensitivity of MRI in detecting metastases was 86.8% for Reader 1 (R1) and 87.4% for Reader 2 (R2), of PET/CT 66.2% for R1 and 68.2% for R2. Regarding only metastases with diameters of 10mm or less, sensitivities of MRI were 66.7% for R1 and 75.0% for R2, and were significantly higher than those of PET/CT (17.9% for R1 and 20.5% for R2). ROC analysis showed superiority for lesion classification of MRI as compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: MRI is significantly superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection and classification of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in the detection of small metastases.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">18F-FDG PET/CT</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Magnetic resonance imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI)</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Liver metastases</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Maegerlein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fingerle</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alexander</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Souvatzoglou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michael</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Rummeny</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ernst</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Holzapfel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Konstantin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Abdominal Imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">40/5(2015-06-01), 1213-1222</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-8925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">40:5&lt;1213</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">261</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0283-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0283-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Maegerlein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fingerle</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alexander</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Souvatzoglou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michael</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Rummeny</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ernst</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Holzapfel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Konstantin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Abdominal Imaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">40/5(2015-06-01), 1213-1222</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0942-8925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">40:5&lt;1213</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">261</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
