Reducing the radiation dose for computed tomography colonography using model-based iterative reconstruction

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Patrick Millerd, Robert Paden, Jeffrey Lund, Amy Hara, Wendy Stiles, Miao He, Qing Wu, C. Daniel Johnson]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Abdominal Imaging, 40/5(2015-06-01), 1183-1189
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 605495319
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 605495319
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100530.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150601xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00261-014-0271-1  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00261-014-0271-1 
245 0 0 |a Reducing the radiation dose for computed tomography colonography using model-based iterative reconstruction  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Patrick Millerd, Robert Paden, Jeffrey Lund, Amy Hara, Wendy Stiles, Miao He, Qing Wu, C. Daniel Johnson] 
520 3 |a Purpose: To determine whether radiation doses during computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) can be further reduced while maintaining image quality using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Methods: Twenty patients underwent CTC at a standard dose in supine and prone positions and at a reduced dose in the supine position. All other scan parameters (except noise index) were held constant. Acquisitions were reconstructed using 3 algorithms: filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and MBIR. Noise was assessed quantitatively by comparing the SD in Hounsfield units at 5 standard locations. Qualitative assessment was made by 2 experienced radiologists blinded to technique who subjectively scored image quality, noise, and sharpness (from 0 to 4). Results: The standard-dose and reduced-dose CT dose index/dose-length product were 6.7/328 and 2.7mGy/129mGy-cm, respectively (60% reduction). Measured mean noise level increased from the standard to the reduced dose (FBP, from 58.6 to 97.2; ASIR from 35.8 to 60.6; and MBIR from 16.6 to 21.9). MBIR had significantly less noise than ASIR on 2-dimensional images at both standard and reduced doses (P<.01). Conclusions: Radiation dose in CTC using MBIR can be reduced by 60% while maintaining image quality and reducing image noise. 
540 |a Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014 
690 7 |a Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Computed tomography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CT colonography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Iterative reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Model-based iterative reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Reduced dose  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a ASIR : Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a BMI : Body mass index (weight in kg divided by height in m2 [kg/m2])  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CT : Computed tomography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a CTC : Computed tomography colonography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a DLP : Dose-length product  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a FBP : Filtered back projection  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a HIPAA : Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a kVp : Kilovolts peak  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a mAs : Milliamperes-second  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a MBIR : Model-based iterative reconstruction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a MDCT : Multidetector computed tomography  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a mSv : Millisievert  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Millerd  |D Patrick  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Paden  |D Robert  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lund  |D Jeffrey  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hara  |D Amy  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stiles  |D Wendy  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a He  |D Miao  |u Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wu  |D Qing  |u Division of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Daniel Johnson  |D C.  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/5(2015-06-01), 1183-1189  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:5<1183  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0271-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0271-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Millerd  |D Patrick  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Paden  |D Robert  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Lund  |D Jeffrey  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Hara  |D Amy  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Stiles  |D Wendy  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a He  |D Miao  |u Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wu  |D Qing  |u Division of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Daniel Johnson  |D C.  |u Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Abdominal Imaging  |d Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com  |g 40/5(2015-06-01), 1183-1189  |x 0942-8925  |q 40:5<1183  |1 2015  |2 40  |o 261