<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">605495580</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100532.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11219-014-9229-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11219-014-9229-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ullah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Najeeb</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A method for predicting open source software residual defects</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Najeeb Ullah]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nowadays many commercial projects use open source applications or components (OSS). A recurring problem is therefore the selection of the most appropriate OSS for a project. A relevant criterion for selection is the reliability of the OSS. In this paper, we propose a method that selects the software reliability growth model (SRGM), which among several alternative models best predicts the reliability of the OSS, in terms of residual defects. Several methods exist for predicting residual defects in software, and a widely used method is SRGM. SRGM has underlying assumptions, which are often violated in practice, but empirical evidence has shown that many models are quite robust despite these assumption violations. However, within the SRGM family, many models are available, and it is often difficult to know which models are better to apply in a given context. We present an empirical method that applies various SRGMs iteratively on OSS defect data and selects the model which best predicts the residual defects of the OSS. We empirically validate the method by applying it to defect data collected from 21 different releases of 7 OSS projects. The results show that the method helps in selecting the best model among several alternative models. The method selects the best model 17 times out of 21. In the remaining 4, it selects the second best model.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Open source software</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Software reliability</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Software reliability models</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Software reliability growth models</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Software selection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Software Quality Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2015-03-01), 55-76</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0963-9314</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;55</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11219</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9229-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9229-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ullah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Najeeb</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Software Quality Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2015-03-01), 55-76</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0963-9314</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;55</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11219</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
