<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">60549584X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210128100533.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210128e20150601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11219-014-9235-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11219-014-9235-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Exploring fault types, detection activities, and failure severity in an evolving safety-critical software system</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Maggie Hamill, Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Many papers have been published on analysis and prediction of software faults and/or failures, but few established the links from software faults (i.e., the root causes) to (potential or observed) failures and addressed multiple attributes. This paper aims at filling this gap by studying types of faults that caused software failures, activities taking place when faults were detected or failures were reported, and the severity of failures. Furthermore, it explores the associations among these attributes and the trends within releases (i.e., pre-release and post-release) and across releases. The results are based on the data extracted from a safety-critical NASA mission, which follows an evolutionary development process. In particular, we analyzed 21 large-scale software components, which together constitute over 8,000 files and millions of lines of code. The main insights include: (1)only a few fault types were responsible for the majority of failures pre-release and post-release, and across releases. Analysis and testing activities detected the majority of failures caused by each fault type. (2)The distributions of fault types differed for pre-release and post-release failures. (3)The percentage of safety-critical failures was small overall, and their relative contribution increased on-orbit. (4)Both post-release failures and safety-critical failures were more heavily associated with coding faults than with any other type of faults. (5)Components that experienced high number of failures in one release were not necessarily among high failure-prone components in the subsequent release. (6)Components that experienced more failures pre-release were more likely to fail post-release, overall and for each release.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media New York, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Software quality assurance</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fault type</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Detection activity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Failure severity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Evolutionary development</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hamill</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Maggie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Goseva-Popstojanova</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Katerina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Software Quality Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/2(2015-06-01), 229-265</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0963-9314</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:2&lt;229</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11219</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9235-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9235-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hamill</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Maggie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Goseva-Popstojanova</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Katerina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Software Quality Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/2(2015-06-01), 229-265</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0963-9314</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:2&lt;229</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2015</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11219</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
