Deriving meaningful scientific laws from abstract, "gedanken” type, axioms: five examples

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Jean-Claude Falmagne]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2015
Enthalten in:
Aequationes mathematicae, 89/2(2015-04-01), 393-435
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 60550900X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 60550900X
003 CHVBK
005 20210128100639.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 210128e20150401xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1007/s00010-015-0339-1  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00010-015-0339-1 
100 1 |a Falmagne  |D Jean-Claude  |u University of California, Irvine, USA  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Deriving meaningful scientific laws from abstract, "gedanken” type, axioms: five examples  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Jean-Claude Falmagne] 
520 3 |a A scientific law can be a faithful representation of the physical world only if its form is invariant with respect to changes in the unit or units. This is referred to as the ‘meaningfulness condition.' This condition is powerful. If we require it, the mathematical form of a scientific or geometric law may be derivable from some abstract constraint, possibly verifiable by a thought experiment or a trivial argument. We discuss five examples of such abstract constraints in this paper: 1. the $${associativity equation: \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad F(F(x,y),z) \,= \,F(x,F(y,z));}$$ a s s o c i a t i v i t y e q u a t i o n : F ( F ( x , y ) , z ) = F ( x , F ( y , z ) ) ; 2. the $${quasi-permutability equation: \qquad\qquad\quad\ \ F(G(x,y),z) \,=\, F(G(x,z),y));}$$ q u a s i - p e r m u t a b i l i t y e q u a t i o n : F ( G ( x , y ) , z ) = F ( G ( x , z ) , y ) ) ; 3. the $${bisymmetry equation: \qquad\qquad\qquad\quad F(F(x,y),\!F(z,w))\! = \!F(F(x,z),F(y,w));}$$ b i s y m m e t r y e q u a t i o n : F ( F ( x , y ) , F ( z , w ) ) = F ( F ( x , z ) , F ( y , w ) ) ; 4. the $${translation equation: \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad\ \ F(F(x,y),z) = F(x, y+z);}$$ t r a n s l a t i o n e q u a t i o n : F ( F ( x , y ) , z ) = F ( x , y + z ) ; 5. the $${abstract Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction: \quad\ \ \ L(L(\ell ,v),w) = L(\ell , v\oplus w).}$$ a b s t r a c t L o r e n t z - F i t z G e r a l d c o n t r a c t i o n : L ( L ( ℓ , v ) , w ) = L ( ℓ , v ⊕ w ) . In each case, just one or a couple of meaningful mathematical representations are possible. In this paper, we derive the possible meaningful representations in five examples. These results are obtained under some general conditions, in addition to those listed in 1-5. Other meaningful representations may be possible under different additional conditions. 
540 |a Springer Basel, 2015 
773 0 |t Aequationes mathematicae  |d Springer Basel  |g 89/2(2015-04-01), 393-435  |x 0001-9054  |q 89:2<393  |1 2015  |2 89  |o 10 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-015-0339-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
900 7 |a Metadata rights reserved  |b Springer special CC-BY-NC licence  |2 nationallicence 
908 |D 1  |a research-article  |2 jats 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-springer 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-015-0339-1  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Falmagne  |D Jean-Claude  |u University of California, Irvine, USA  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Aequationes mathematicae  |d Springer Basel  |g 89/2(2015-04-01), 393-435  |x 0001-9054  |q 89:2<393  |1 2015  |2 89  |o 10